Samsung Scrapes to Victory in Proxy Battle Over 8 Billion Dollar Domerger

Samsung Group\'s founding family on Friday scored a narrow win in a landmark proxy battle, fending off an activist investor opposed to an $8 billion deal that cements its grip as a new generation prepares to take the reins of South Korea\'s biggest conglomerate.

Published: 17th July 2015 02:40 PM  |   Last Updated: 17th July 2015 02:40 PM   |  A+A-

SEOUL: Samsung Group's founding family on Friday scored a narrow win in a landmark proxy battle, fending off an activist investor opposed to an $8 billion deal that cements its grip as a new generation prepares to take the reins of South Korea's biggest conglomerate.

At an often-heated shareholder meeting, investors in builder Samsung C&T Corp approved an all-share takeover offer from sister firm Cheil Industries Inc, Samsung's de facto holding company - but only just. With the backing of two-thirds of votes cast needed for success, some 69.53 percent of shares voted supported the tie-up.

U.S. hedge fund Elliott Associates, with a 7.1 percent Samsung C&T stake, had led the charge against the deal, saying it undervalued the target. That view was shared by an impassioned group of domestic retail investors, who saw a merger that bolsters the Lee family's control of Samsung Electronics Co as riding roughshod over minority interests.

"While the deal will boost Samsung's restructuring, Samsung lost the faith of a lot of foreign and minority shareholders," said Kang Dong-oh, a proxy representative for an online forum of minority shareholders against the merger.

Each of the two firms has stakes in key Samsung companies, including flagship tech giant Samsung Electronics. With 73-year-old group patriarch Lee Kun-hee hospitalised following a heart attack last year, the C&T-Cheil merger consolidates holdings into one entity firmly under the control of 47-year-old heir-apparent Jay Y. Lee and his two sisters.

Investors and analysts predict the Lees may now attempt to further consolidate control of Samsung Electronics by having it acquire IT services firm Samsung SDS Co Ltd, or even by splitting Samsung Electronics into an operating company and a holding company through which they can exert control.

Samsung has promised post-deal measures including higher dividends and a governance committee. "We will listen to those who opposed the deal and pledge to better engage with our shareholders and be more open to their input and feedback," C&T and Cheil said in a joint statement.

Shares in both C&T and Cheil fell sharply after the vote, dropping 10.4 percent and 7.7 percent respectively, as those among investors who had been hoping bid terms might be sweetened exited the stocks.



Even though it fell short on Friday, Elliott's campaign is expected to compel other family conglomerates, or 'chaebols', which dominate the Korean economy, to be more mindful of minority investors. South Korean stocks often trade at discounts to global peers due to opaque shareholding structures and low dividends.

"The chaebols won't be able to simply have their way anymore. They have probably all realised now how scary shareholders and the market can be," said Park Jung-hoon, fund manager at HDC Asset Management.

During the spat Elliott filed for two injunctions to stop the vote taking place. With a stake of more than 2 percent in the merged entity, deal-watchers expect it to continue challenging Samsung with lawsuits.

"Elliott is disappointed that the takeover appears to have been approved against the wishes of so many independent shareholders and reserves all options at its disposal," the fund said in a statement.

Turnout for the vote was high, with 83.57 percent of eligible votes cast. Roughly 1,000 people crowded a conference hall and three overflow rooms reserved for the meeting in southern Seoul.

C&T's biggest shareholder, South Korea's National Pension Service (NPS), cast its 11.2 percent voting stake in favour of the deal, said a person with direct knowledge of the matter, providing decisive support for Samsung.

The NPS made its decision without consulting an external committee that it sometimes calls upon for difficult votes - and which often votes against company management. The committee on Friday made a rare statement saying it was regrettable that it was not consulted.

The pension fund declined to comment.

Stay up to date on all the latest Business news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp