Setback for School, Order on RTE Set Aside

The High Court on Tuesday set aside an interim order by a single judge in February giving relaxation to Vani Education Trust in providing admissions under the Right to Education Act (RTE).

Published: 30th April 2014 08:18 AM  |   Last Updated: 30th April 2014 08:33 AM   |  A+A-

The High Court on Tuesday set aside an interim order by a single judge in February giving relaxation to Vani Education Trust in providing admissions under the Right to Education Act (RTE).

A division bench comprising Chief Justice D H Waghela and Justice B V Nagarathna allowed the appeal filed by the state government challenging the single judge order. The single judge had directed the Education Department officials not to take coercive action against Vani Education Trust for not adhering to the provisions of the Right to Education Act (RTE).

The government in its appeal submitted that Vani Education Trust, which claims to have a minority status, has not obtained certification from a competent authority.

Further, Vani Eduction Trust and other members of the Karnataka State Minority Educational Institutions Managements’ Federation cannot be excluded from the RTE ambit as they had admitted students under RTE Act in the previous academic year, counsel representing the state government submitted.

He further submitted that according to  Supreme Court directions, RTE should apply  from 2012 itself and Vani Education Trust had given admissions under RTE in the academic year 2013-14 and the state government had also sanctioned `2.78 lakh to the trust. The trust had given a representation to the state government seeking minority status on February 10. The state has formed a three-member committee to deal with the issue, but the committee is yet to make recommendations and hence the state sought the setting aside of the single bench order.

The bench also directed the state government to consider the representation given by the members of the Karnataka State Minority Educational Institutions Managements’ Federation and disposed of an appeal.

Bail Petition Rejected

The High Court on Tuesday rejected a bail petition filed by Vivek Hebbar, proprietor of Dream Logistics Company (DLC) and son of Yellapur MLA Shivaram Hebbar.

Justice N Anand dismissed the petition filed by Vivek, who is one of the accused in the Belekeri port scam. The CBI court had earlier rejected the bail petition. Along with Vivek, CBI had filed chargesheet against 16 others. DLC allegedly exported nine lakh tonnes of ore between January 1, 2009 and May 31, 2010, of which three lakh tonnes were illegal. Sham Singh, cousin of MLA B S  Anand Singh, Idli Yarriswamy and Kudligi MLA B Nagendra were arrested for supplying illegal ore to DLC.

CID Inquiry Sought

The High Court on Tuesday allowed a petition filed by one G Thimmaiah seeking Criminal Investigation Department (CID) inquiry into the selling of fake stamp paper by notary B V Keshava Bhat in Bhimaguli last year.

It is said that Bhat was found with two fake rubber stamps and had allegedly issued forged documents, misusing his position.

Justice S N Satyanarayana allowed the petition filed by Thimmaiah, who sought cancellation of bail granted to Bhat and sought a CID inquiry.

Petition Dismissed

Justice Satyanarayana dismissed a petition filed by Sub-Inspector Sunil Kumar of Subrahmanya police station in Panja village of Puttur taluk in Dakshina Kannada district, challenging his suspension.

Kumar had released Bhat on station bail and the accused has been absconding since.

Stay up to date on all the latest Bengaluru news with The New Indian Express App. Download now

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

Asian Games 2018