Encroacher restrained from building structure on temple land in Padi

Passing interim orders, suo-motu, the Madras High Court on Wednesday has restrained an individual from proceeding.

CHENNAI: Passing interim orders, suo-motu, the Madras High Court on Wednesday has restrained an individual from proceeding with putting up structures on the land belonging to the Tiruvalleeswarar temple in Jegadhambikai Nagar at Padi in Chennai.

A vacation bench of Justices N Kirubakaran and MV Muralidharan granted the injunction while entertaining a writ petition from K Velu of Vadapalani, on May 12.

“Though there is no petition seeking any interim injunction, this court, based on the facts of the case, is inclined to suo-motu grant interim injunction taking into consideration that construction is being made by Pandian inspite of the orders passed by the Civil Court. Accordingly, there shall be an order of interim injunction restraining Pandian from proceeding with the construction in any way until further orders,’’ the bench said.

The matter was posted for further hearing on June 9.

Velu has approached the HC with a plea to order the removal of the encroachments put up by Pandian on the temple land.

To ascertain the correct position, the bench on an earlier occasion, had directed KV Dhanapalan, Additional Government Pleader (HR&CE), to verify the position and inform the court.

Accordingly, he inspected the place and informed the court that Pandian was a tenant under the temple and his lease had been terminated.

In fact, when Pandian had attempted to make construction, the management of Tiruvalleeswarar temple had filed a civil suit in the lower court in Ambattur and an interim order restraining him from making any construction had been obtained in 2014, which is still in force.

Inspite of that order, Pandian is proceeding with the construction, KV Dhanapalan added.

The court was also informed that proceedings under the HR&CE Act has also been initiated against Pandian to vacate him from the premises.

“When that is the position, Pandian has got no right or business to make any construction of any nature,’’ the bench said and passed the interim injunction order.

Though there is no petition seeking any interim injunction, this court is inclined to suo-motu grant it, taking into consideration that construction is being made by Pandian inspite of the orders passed by the Civil Court

Madras High Court Vacation Bench

Related Stories

No stories found.

X
The New Indian Express
www.newindianexpress.com