Chennai Silks fire: Experts blame failure to enforce Section 113-C rules

The fire at Chennai Silks in T Nagar could have been averted if the State government had implemented rules under Section 113-C of the Town and Country Planning Act,1971 to regularise or grant amnesty

Published: 01st June 2017 06:07 AM  |   Last Updated: 01st June 2017 06:07 AM   |  A+A-

Express News Service

CHENNAI: The fire at Chennai Silks in T Nagar could have been averted if the State government had implemented rules under Section 113-C of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 to regularise or grant amnesty to illegal buildings built before July 2007, according to Madras High Court-appointed Monitoring Committee member MG Devasahayam. “If the rules had been implemented, the building would have been sealed under the provisions,” he said.

The rules for Section 113-C have been framed by Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) in consultation with the monitoring committee, following orders of Madras High Court after it struck down earlier rules.

It is learned that 25 buildings, including the Chennai Silks building, on Usman Road in T Nagar, which are unauthorised, will fail relaxations that have been provided under Section 113-C, as none of them have complied with fire safety norms, according to CMDA sources.
The entire T Nagar area was a residential zone, and a section of traders in T Nagar have sought reclassification of area, where large-scale illegal constructions are situated, to commercial zone and pass a special Government Order to legalise buildings.

Interestingly, Usman Road is part of the T Nagar Smart City. Around 1,717 acres of the area was selected for development under area-based development, a component of smart city, with an estimated outlay of `878 crore.
Chennai Silks was facing demolition in 2006
The Chennai Silks building was facing demolition in 2006 after a SC order, according to information available with Express. The demolition was carried out stage-by- stage, but demolished portions were re-built by the owner.

It was in 2007 that an ordinance was passed by the State government, which gave a lifeline to unauthorised buildings wherein punitive actions against all unauthorised developments were suspended. This ordinance was passed by a State government committee, headed by Supreme Court judge S Mohan, to look into all aspects of development.
Just when unauthorised developments were to face the axe again, the Government came up with Section 113-C, and later formed a committee under Justice Rajeshwaran, after Madras High Court struck down rules of regularising illegal buildings while upholding the amendment to the act.

Stay up to date on all the latest Chennai news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp