Drones monitor wildlife better than humans

Monitoring animals with drones produced better data that could be used to proactively manage wildlife. 

Published: 15th February 2018 04:57 PM  |   Last Updated: 15th February 2018 04:57 PM   |  A+A-

Accurate monitoring using drones can detect small changes in animal numbers.

By IANS

CANBERRA (AUSTRALIA):  Australian researchers say wildlife is better monitored by drones which can detect small changes important to notice decline in numbers leading to superior conservation of threatened species.

The scientists from University of Adelaide employed thousands of rubber ducks to prove that drones are more accurate than humans, Xinhua news agency reported.

Experienced wildlife spotters were pitted against spotters who counted birds from drone imagery to see which group would get closest to the actual number of fake birds.

Ground spotters counted the birds using binoculars or telescopes while a drone was flown over the beach, taking pictures from different heights and angles.

"We found it is more accurate and more precise to have people count birds from the drone imagery than to do it on location," lead author Jarrod Hodgson said.

The results showed that monitoring animals with drones produced better data that could be used to proactively manage wildlife. 

Hodgson and his team developed a computer algorithm capable of counting birds from the drone images, yielding results on par with humans counting from the images.

"With so many animals across the world facing extinction, our need for accurate wildlife data has never been greater," Hodgson said.

"Accurate monitoring can detect small changes in animal numbers. That is important because if we had to wait for a big shift in those numbers to notice the decline, it might be too late to conserve a threatened species.

"For a few years now, drones have been used to monitor different animals that can be seen from above, including elephants, seals and nesting birds.

"But, until now, the accuracy of using drones to count wildlife was unclear," Hodgson said.

"We needed to test the technology where we knew the correct answer. We couldn't use wild animals because we could never be sure of the real number of individuals present."

Stay up to date on all the latest Tech news with The New Indian Express App. Download now

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

Asian Games 2018