Katju's Allegations Completely Baseless: Balakrishnan

Current chairperson of NHRC and former CJI K G Balakrishnan says Katju\'s allegations are not factually correct and deny any political pressure or corruption

Published: 21st July 2014 08:16 PM  |   Last Updated: 21st July 2014 11:22 PM   |  A+A-

KG Balakrishnan_EPS

It is completely baseless. It is not factually correct, the former Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan, who is one of the three CJIs Katju accused of improper compromises, said | EPS File Photo

By PTI

NEW DELHI:  Former Chief Justice of India K G Balakrishnan on Monday hit back at Press Council of India Chairman Markandey Katju, terming as "completely baseless" his allegations that he and two other ex-CJIs made "improper compromises" in retaining a Tamil Nadu judge under corruption cloud during the United Progressive Alliance government's rule.

Wondering why Katju, a former Supreme Court Judge, raised the issue after so many years, Balakrishnan said the concerned judge, who has passed away, was given extension strictly following the laid down procedure and that it was not done under any pressure from any quarters.

"It is completely baseless. It is not factually correct," the former Chief Justice of India, who is one of the three CJIs Katju had accused of improper compromises, said.

Two other CJIs, Justices R C Lahoti and Y K Sabharwal, did not respond to Katju's allegations.

"In confirmation of a judge, what is improper compromise .... After 10 years, he makes these (allegations) and that too when that gentleman is no more," Balakrishnan said.

katju_PTi.jpgMarkandey Katju on Monday stirred a controversy by alleging that three ex-Chief Justices of India had compromised in giving extension to an additional judge of Madras High court at the instance of UPA government in the wake of pressure from one of its allies, apparently DMK.

Katju made the charge while alleging how the three former CJIs--Justices R C Lahoti, Y K Sabharwal and K G Balakrishnan--had made "imroper compromises" in allowing the judge, against whom there were several allegations of corruption, to continue in office. Read More

 

Balakrishnan, currently chairperson of National Human Rights Commission, however, said there were allegations against the judge that he had some acquaintances with the ruling party in Tamil Nadu and that is why he had transferred him to Andhra Pradesh.

Asked about the IB report mentioned by Katju, he said he was not aware of it.

"I thought it fit to transfer him to Andhra Pradesh. That was the best thing we can do. Because that party is not ruling party in Andhra Pradesh. He was confirmed and sent to Andhra Pradesh. This is the only factual report," Balakrishnan said.

"There is no political pressure or anything of that sort or any corruption. I do not know what he (Katju) is saying," he said. Justice Balakrishnan said it was for the High Court Chief Justices to assess quality of work of any judge in case of his confirmation or extension.

"All confirmation is done only after receiving a satisfactory report from the Chief Justice of the concerned High Court. There is no other procedure. Unless we get such a report, no judge, additional judge would be confirmed as a permanent judge,"

- KG Balakrishnan

He said extension to the judge in question was given on the basis of a report by the then CJI of the Tamil Nadu High Court.

 

Asked whether the issue should have gone to Supreme Court Collegium, he said the opinion of Chief Justice of particular High Court is taken in such matters.

"Earlier there was no practice of cases of confirmation going to Collegium," he said, adding because of these kinds of allegations, now certain cases are sent to Collegium.

"Because of these kinds of allegations, now I think they seek opinion of other members of the Collegium," he said.           

Katju, who was a Supreme Court judge from 2006 to 2011, was appointed as the PCI Chairman on October 5, 2011 and is due to retire on October 4 this year.

Asked why he was making this disclosure several years after this episode, a rattled Katju said the timing was "immaterial" and instead the matter should be probed to find out whether it was correct or not.

Also Read:

Demand for Probe into Katju's Charges, Timing Questioned

AIADMK Demands Probe into Allegations of Graft in Judiciary

CPI Asks Former PM, Congress to Explain Charges Levelled by Katju

 

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp