Manmohan's Office Intervened in Madras HC Judge Case: Government

The PMO during the UPA tenure had sought clarification after the SC collegium expressed its hesitation to recommended extension for an HC judge who was facing corruption charges.

Published: 22nd July 2014 11:02 PM  |   Last Updated: 22nd July 2014 11:45 PM   |  A+A-

Manmohan_PTI
By PTI

NEW DELHI: The Prime Minister's Office (PMO) during Manmohan Singh's tenure had asked why the Supreme Court collegium had not recommended extension for a Madras High Court judge who was facing corruption charges after the collegium expressed its hesitation, Law Minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said in Parliament on Tuesday.

Giving details of the controversial case over which Parliament witnessed uproar over the last two days, he said in 2003, the Supreme Court collegium had "certain  reservations" and had made some enquiries and decided that the case of this judge should not be taken up.

But later during the UPA rule, a clarification was sought by the PMO as to why he should not be recommended, the minister said in the Lok Sabha. The collegium, however, again said he should not have been recommended at all.

Later, the Department of Justice in the Law Ministry wrote a note to the collegium following which it said that his case can be considered for some extension, Prasad said, adding the matter stood there thereafter.

"...on July 16, 2005 to be precise, again a note went from the then Department of Justice with the approval of the then Law Minister indicating about certain sensitivity.

Thereafter, a call was taken by the collegium that his case can be considered for some extension and he was made permanent," he said.

The case which was recently brought to light by former Supreme Court judge Markandey Katju.

The Law Minister said the judge has since retired and was no more now. The judges of the collegium have also retired.

Quoting Supreme Court's observation in Shanti Bhushan case, he remarked the "clock cannot be put back".

Furore in Parliament

His response came after an uproar over the issue forced two adjournments of the Lok Sabha as agitated AIADMK members stormed the Well demanding that the name of the then DMK minister who "pressurised" the UPA government to confirm the appointment of controversial judge be made public.

The Rajya Sabha also saw disruption on the issue, with AIADMK and DMK members clashing on the matter when it assembled for the day leading to a brief adjournment.

The concern raised by the AIADMK members was well appreciated and there is imperative need to improve the system of judges appointment, Prasad said, adding the government was "quite keen" to appoint a National Judicial Commission for making such appointments.

Also Read:

Katju Acting Under Indirect Pressure, Says Karunanidhi

Corrupt Judge Charge: Katju Poses Six Questions to Lahoti

Didn't Cave in to Any Pressure: Ex-CJs

Katju's Allegations Completely Baseless: Balakrishnan

Demand for Probe into Katju's Charges, Timing Questioned

Katju: 3 Former CJIs Made "Improper Compromises" 

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp