SC to Hear Sahara Chief's Plea Today

A two-member Supreme Court Bench will on Thursday take up a petition filed by Sahara chief Subrata Roy demanding his immediate release on the grounds that his detention is illegal and unconstitutional.

Published: 13th March 2014 06:00 AM  |   Last Updated: 13th March 2014 01:15 AM   |  A+A-

A two-member Supreme Court Bench will on Thursday take up a petition filed by Sahara chief Subrata Roy demanding his immediate release on the grounds that his detention is illegal and unconstitutional. “Declare the order dated March 4 as void, nullity and non-est in the eyes of law,” said the habeas corpus filed on Wednesday.

Earlier in the day, Sahara’s lawyers failed to get any immediate relief, with a Bench headed by Chief Justice(CJI) P Sathasivam referring the matter to a two-member Bench of Justice K S Radhakrishnan and Justice J S Khehar.

The two-Judge Bench had on March 4, sent Roy and two Sahara Group directors to Tihar jail in connection with the case relating to the company’s failure to refund `20,000 crore to  investors.

The same Bench had briefly heard the matter on Wednesday  when senior counsel Ram Jethmalani, appearing for the Sahara chief, made a strong plea for rectification of the mistake in the March 4 order.

“It is a little embarrassing to argue before you that your order needs rectification,” said Jethmalani and added, “It is deeply embarrassing for me but if the Lordship is willing to hear then I would make my Lordships quite satisfied with my arguments.”

However, the Bench said it would go through the petition and hear the matter on Thursday and would give vent to its feelings then.

“We will go through the pleadings then we will say whether we are embarrassed or not,” Justice Khehar shot back.

In a hard-hitting petition, Roy submitted that detaining him is “purely illegal, contrary to the procedure prescribed by law and against the principles of natural justice”.

Roy questioned the Constitutional validity of the detention order saying it was passed after an “illusionary” hearing.

“The petitioner submits that the impugned order made after such illusionary hearing is in total defiance of the rules framed under the Constitution and is a gross violation of the principles of natural justice,” he said in the petition.

“The Bench of this Court without compliance with law and principles of natural justice has incarcerated him under a law which does not exist and without following the ordinary cannons of natural justice,” the petition said.

It also contended that Roy is not liable for contempt as he is not a director or officer-in-charge of the two Sahara firms, which had collected the  money from the investors.

“The Petitioner is a shareholder of Sahara India Real Estate Corporation(SIRECL) and Sahara Housing and Investment Corporation Limited(SHICL).

“The Petitioner holds 0.03 per cent shares in SIRECL and 0.112 per cent shares in SHICL.”

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp