Congress lambasts surrogacy Bill, calls it an unscientific Stone Age draft

Swaraj who communicated the decision, said it had become a fashion with celebs using it to make their wives avoid labour

Published: 27th August 2016 04:49 AM  |   Last Updated: 27th August 2016 04:49 AM   |  A+A-

PTI8_24_2016_000156B

External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj and Union Health Minister J P Nadda addressing a press conference after the Union Cabinet gave its approval for introduction of Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2016, at national media centre in New Delhi on Wednesday.

NEW DELHI: Short of calling it draconian, the Congress on Friday lambasted the new draft surrogacy Bill as “retrogressive” in every possible way. Indicating that it would oppose the Bill tooth and nail, the party said it reflected “Stone Age” mentality, completely “out of sync with the times”.

The Union Cabinet had earlier approved the draft Bill with a strong critique against what it called “womb-renting” and commercial exploitation of surrogacy using poor women.

External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj who communicated the Union Cabinet’s decision to the media, said it had almost become a fashion with celebrities who were misusing it to make their wives avoid labour pain. Though Swaraj never mentioned them, the hint was obvious — Bollywood superstar Shah Rukh Khan and his wife Gauri famously had opted for surrogacy for their third child, AbRam.

Meanwhile, taking on the government, Congress spokesperson Abhishek Manu Singhvi claimed that the draft Bill approved by the Modi Cabinet was not just stringent, but also “anti-liberal and anti-civil rights”. “Look at the punishment, the Bill provides for 10-year imprisonment for breaking any of the surrogacy clauses.”

The Cabinet-approved draft Bill, which is expected to go the Standing Committee of Parliament for stake-holders feedback, allows infertile couples to go for surrogacy, but only through a relative. Many countries, including the UK, have similarly banned commercial surrogacy.

But the Congress is of the view that the new Bill seems to be “something resembling an unscientific draft from the Stone Ages”. It was strange that the reason for excluding Overseas Citizen of India and foreigners is that “divorces are very common in foreign countries”. “They have delegated the drafting of this surrogacy bill perhaps to the surrogate RSS and VHP,” he said.

Singhvi said the UPA draft bill — the Assisted Reproductive Technologies Bill — too had sought to ban homosexuals from opting for surrogate parenthood, but contrary to the new draft “our approach was to address individual needs — case by case, with several pros and cons like guardianship clause for NRI, during the period of surrogacy, etc. “Why are they restricting surrogacy to married couples? It could be desired by widows, live-in partners, NRIs,” he said. If all categories are banned, then why have surrogacy at all, he asked.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp