Allahabad High Court terms ‘triple talaq’ as unconstitutional

A bench said that Triple Talaq violated human rights and that personal law of any community cannot be above the constitution.

Published: 08th December 2016 12:48 PM  |   Last Updated: 08th December 2016 11:52 PM   |  A+A-

Verdict_on_Validity

Representational Image Only. | File Photo

Express News Service

LUCKNOW: When Hina, a 23-year-old woman, and her husband, 30 years her senior, hailing from Bulandshahr district in western Uttar Pradesh, moved the court seeking a direction to the police and Hina's mother that they stop harassing the petitioners and their safety and security be ensured, least did they expect that the move would backfire on them.
 
The twist came about when it was revealed in the court that the man had married Hina "after effecting triple talaq to his wife".
 
Questioning the moral integrity of the couple and dismissing the petition, a single judge bench of Justice Suneet Kumar at the Allahabad High Court called the ‘triple talaq’ a form of "instant divorce" and "cruel" and "most demeaning". It "impedes and drags India from becoming a nation".
 
The court, however, made it clear that it was not disputing the contention of the petitioner's counsel that the couple "are adults and are at liberty to choose their own partner" and they "cannot be deprived of their right to life and personal liberty" as per the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution.
 
Need to ‘alleviate the sufferings of Muslim wives’ 
 
"Nor difference in age is an issue", the court said, adding, "What is disturbing is that the instrument of instant divorce (triple talaq) has been used for ulterior purpose (by the man) for divorcing his wife....first petitioner (the woman) left her family and joined the company of the second petitioner and consequently the second petitioner decided to get rid of his first wife".
 
"The question which disturbs the court is - should Muslim wives suffer this tyranny for all times? Should their personal law remain so cruel towards these unfortunate wives? Whether the personal law can be amended suitably to alleviate their sufferings? The judicial conscience is disturbed at this monstrosity", the court noted with concern.
 
Muslim law misinterpreted in India
 
"Muslim law, as applied in India, has taken a course contrary to the spirit of what the Prophet or the Holy Quran laid down and the same misconception vitiates the law dealing with the wife's right to divorce", he said in an order dated November 5.
 
The court observed that "divorce is permissible in Islam only in case of extreme emergency. When all efforts for effecting reconciliation have failed, the parties may proceed to dissolution of marriage by Talaq or by Khola".
 
Man’s unquestioned authority to liquidate the marriage in Islam

The court remarked that it’s a popular fallacy that a Muslim husband enjoys, under the Quranic Law, unbridled authority to liquidate the marriage. The view that the man enjoys an arbitrary, unilateral power to inflict instant divorce does not accord with Islamic injunctions.
 
"The Islamic law gives to the man primarily the faculty of dissolving the marriage, if the wife, by her indocility or her bad character, renders the married life unhappy; but in the absence of serious reasons, no man can justify a divorce, either in the eye of religion or the law", the court said.
 
Eliminating the ‘archaic customs and social practices’

"The purpose of law in a modern, secular state.... is to bring about social change. The Muslim community comprise a large percentage of Indian population, therefore, a large section of citizens, in particular women, cannot be left to be governed by archaic customs and social practice under the garb of personal law purportedly having divine sanction", the court
observed.
 
Triple talaq as opposing individual rights of women

"India is a nation in the making; geographical boundaries alone do not define a nation. It is to be adjudged, amongst others, on the parameter of overall human development and how the society treats its women; leaving such a large population to the whims and fancies of a personal law which perpetuates gender inequality and is regressive, is not in the interest of the society and the country. It impedes and drags India from becoming a nation", the court remarked.
 
Personal laws, of any community, cannot claim supremacy over the rights granted to the individuals by the Constitution, the court said.
 
Stating that it would "not like to say anything further for the reason that the Supreme Court is seized of the matter", the court added that "the legality of the marriage/divorce and rights of parties is kept open".

Amid the heated debates revolving around the implementation of Uniform Civil Code in the country, the decision has raised a few eyebrows. The Muslim Law Board has announced that it will file a petition against the order. 
 
Earlier, in a move against the central government's decision on the imposition of Uniform Civil Code and nullification of ‘triple talaq’, All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) had said it was a practice guided by provisions of the Quran and, hence, the apex court was barred from testing its validity.

(Edited by Anagha Unni)

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.