Now Punjab wants royalties for its river waters

Yes, the state used to be paid for waters of the Satluj during the British Raj.

Published: 16th November 2016 05:37 PM  |   Last Updated: 17th November 2016 06:48 AM   |  A+A-

Express News Service

CHANDIGARH: The Punjab Assembly on Wednesday passed a resolution seeking royalties for river water supplied to its non-riparian neighbours Haryana, Rajasthan and Delhi. It urged the government of Parkash Singh Badal to seek the help of the Union government in extracting the dues.


The demand for royalties for river waters adds another dimension to the Sutlej-Yamuna Link (SYL) canal dispute between Punjab and several of its neighbours. The state has already adopted a hostile stance towards this week’s Supreme Court advice to the President that Punjab had indeed been acting unconstitutionally in scrapping all its previous pledges under the SYL project.

The Assembly’s stance that royalties would have to be paid for the Sutlej river waters it supplied to its neighbours since 1966 is likely to raise the stakes much higher.

AAP member Dharamvir Gandhi protests over the SYL canal issue inside the Parliament complex in New Delhi on Wednesday | PTI

Moving the resolution in the special session, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Madan Mohan Mittal said seeking royalties for river waters was not anything new. Punjab has in the past demanded and received them. The erstwhile riyasats of Bikaner, Patiala, Nabha and Jind paid such royalties till 1945-46 for using Sutlej waters. A law mandating such riparian royalties was in place during the British Raj since 1873.

The resolution, passed unanimously, asked the Badal government to seek New Delhi’s help to recover water dues from Rajasthan, Haryana and Delhi since November 11, 1966.

Chief Minister Parkash Singh Badal moved another resolution directing the state government not to do three things: (a) handing over any land to any agency for construction of the SYL canal; (b) allowing any agency to do any work on the project; (c) cooperating with any agency for the construction of the canal.
Speaking during the special session, Badal repeated the same oaths he has been uttering since the Supreme Court verdict, “I would rather shed every drop of my blood than allow even a single drop of water to flow out of my state.”

The resolution reads, “Whereas Punjab has legislative and executive right over the whole land falling under its boundaries as per the entry number 14 and 18 of the state list of the seventh schedule of the Constitution of India.”

The house also took notice of the fact that Punjab needs 56 million acre feet (MAF) of water for agriculture, out of which river waters account for only 27 per cent. The Central Ground Water Commission has already declared 105 of the 138 blocks in Punjab as over-exploited.

Akali Dal MLA Nirmal Singh said Rajasthan owed Punjab `80,000 crore as the royalty for using its waters. Independent MLA Simarjit Singh Bains put this figure at `15.34 lakh crore.
Adding some more drama to the proceedings, the Bains brothers (S S Bains and Balwinder Bains from Ludhiana) and rebel Akali Dal MLA Pargat Singh announced their resignations on the floor of the Assembly and marched to the well of the House to hand the papers to the speaker.

The speaker, however, refused to accept them and asked them to tender them in his office.
With the 42 MLAs of the Congress absent — they have resigned — Chief Minister Badal indulged in some unchallenged Congress bashing. He accused the party of doublespeak: they were shedding crocodile tears over the Supreme Court verdict but stayed away from arguing Punjab’s case in the Assembly.

State Congress president Capt Amarinder Singh ridiculed the two resolutions passed by special session. He said, “Punjab simply cannot give water to its non-riparian neighbours at any cost.”

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

facebook twitter whatsapp