Celebrities can still be scrutinised, say legal eagles

Now that the apex court has reiterated that right to privacy is a fundamental right, irrespective of whether an individual is a public personality or not, will Thursday’s landmark judgement change the

Published: 25th August 2017 08:47 AM  |   Last Updated: 25th August 2017 08:47 AM   |  A+A-

Express News Service

HYDERABAD: Now that the apex court has reiterated that right to privacy is a fundamental right, irrespective of whether an individual is a public personality or not, will Thursday’s landmark judgement change the way the media cover celebrities?

The verdict comes a few weeks after 12 Tollywood personalities were summoned by the Telangana Prohibition and Excise Department in connection with an investigation into drug peddling in Hyderabad. The celebs, their identities disclosed by the authorities before any charges were filed against them, were subjected to wide media coverage. Weeks earlier, actor Ravi Teja was subjected to media scrutiny when he chose not to attend his brother’s funeral.

The lives of celebrities do have a bearing on the public domain if their actions influence public opinion. If this is reported, then it will not qualify as a violation, said Faizan Mustafa, vice-chancellor of NALSAR University of Law. “In the case of political leaders, if they indulge in activities that cast doubts on their integrity, then people who vote for them should know. On the other hand, if one probes into the reason behind Sonia Gandhi’s treatment, then it is an invasion of privacy and she has the right to withhold the information,” explained Mustafa.

Also, since the right to privacy, or any fundamental right, according to the Constitution, is not an absolute right, reporting details of celebrities’ lives will not entirely amount to a violation of their privacy, he said.
Prof Gali Vinod Kumar, former principal, PG College of Law, Osmania University, said celebrities do have a public responsibility. “If you take the case of actor Ravi Teja, he can’t be questioned on public grounds. Constitutionally, it is not anyone’s business to find out why he didn’t attend his brother’s funeral and he cannot be coerced to give an explanation,” said the professor.

However, in the case of celebrities who were summoned for the drug investigation, they have to bow to the State as the information sought from them is crucial to fight a major social problem, he added. “There is no question of right to privacy in this case,” he stressed.

Akun Sabharwal, director of Telangana Excise, said the decision of the Supreme Court would be followed in word and spirit as his staff proceed with their investigation. “We have to wait for the guidelines,” he said.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp