Gujarat HC allows dropping of rape charge by man's live-in partner

The court dropped rape charge while allowed continuation of probe in other charges against the accused.

Published: 09th March 2017 06:09 AM  |   Last Updated: 09th March 2017 06:09 AM   |  A+A-


AHMEDABAD: The Gujarat High Court has dropped rape charge slapped against a retired police official by his live-in partner. The court while hearing the matter also expressed concern over "adultery, divorce and remarriage being treated casually" these days. Justice J B Pardiwala in his judgement on February 27 also observed that "prenuptial contracts" are becoming a popular way to take out economic insurance against a likely future divorce.

A retired police official Bhavjibhai Chavda had moved the court seeking quashing of FIR under sections 376 (rape), 406 (criminal breach of trust), 420 (cheating), 467 (forgery of valuable security), 468 (forgery for purpose of cheating), 471 (using as genuine a forged document) and 506(2)(criminal intimidation) of the IPC registered against him by his live-in partner of 16 years. The court dropped rape charge while allowed continuation of probe in other charges against the accused.

"Many people today consider marriage solely in terms of biology, sociology or culture," he said. "One result is that the premarital sex, trial marriage, and cohabitation are a commonplace today. Adultery, divorce, and remarriage are treated casually. "Prenuptial contracts are becoming a popular way to take out economic insurance against a likely future divorce," Pardiwala said in his judgement, while partly quashing FIR on offence of rape against him.

The complainant, a mother of two had told the police that she developed friendship with Chavda who promised to buy a house for her and gold jewellery, and transfer a land in the name of his wife in her name if she took divorce. While she took divorce from her husband to stay with her live-in partner, he eventually refused to marry her and instead forged her signature to sell a property to a third party, she said.

Her counsel while opposing Chavda's petition had submitted before the court that the police should be allowed to complete investigation in accordance with law to make picture clearer. Chavda's lawyer, on the other hand, submitted that even if her allegations are true, none of it constitutes rape, is an abuse of the process of law, and allegations of forgery is also baseless.

The court further observed in his judgement that "If the person is able to prove that a clear actionable wrong is done, claim for damages is maintainable. Merely because the parties had illicit cohabitation would not make the legal and valid cause of action illegal and immoral. "It is well-settled that breach of promise to marry is actionable and damages and compensation for such breach can be awarded."

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

facebook twitter whatsapp