Government refused to give Supreme Court collegium reasons for judge's rejection in writing

Sources said the government was only willing to share the intelligence report on the concerned candidate with the CJI and not the collegium of five top judges of the apex court.

Published: 26th March 2017 09:56 PM  |   Last Updated: 26th March 2017 09:56 PM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court (File | PTI)

By PTI

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court collegium refused to accept the proposal of the executive's right to reject its recommendation for appointment of a judge on the ground of national security as the government refused to give the reasons for rejection in writing.

Though the government is learnt to have held several rounds of discussion with the Chief Justice of India to convince him to accept the national security clause in the proposed Memorandum of Procedure, it was rejected as the government is learnt to have insisted that it would not give anything in writing if a candidate's name is rejected over national security.

Sources said the government was only willing to share the intelligence report on the concerned candidate with the CJI and not the collegium of five top judges of the apex court.

The collegium, on the other hand, was of the view that if the government gave the reasons in writing, the charges could be verified through independent sources.

Seeking to convince the collegium to accept the national security and public interest clauses, the government had said so far it had not rejected any recommendation on national
security issue. It had told the collegium that in the future too, the clause will be invoked sparingly.

But since the government was not ready to give the reasons for rejecting a recommendation on national security consideration, the collegium rejected it.

The body of five senior-most judges of the apex court headed by the Chief Justice of India has made it clear that if the government has objections on the ground of national security and public interest, it will convey the same to the collegium.

The collegium will then take a final call, the sources said.

Since January last, the government and the apex court are trying to finalise the Memorandum of Procedure -- a document to guide appointment of judges to the higher judiciary.

While rejecting the National Judicial Appointments Commission Act, the SC had agreed to revise the memorandum of procedure to usher in more transparency in appointment of judges to the SC and HCs.

The new law had sought to overturn the over two-decade- old collegium system where judges appoint judges. It had sought a say for the executive in appointment of judges. The national security clause and the secretariat clause are part of the draft MoP which has been shuttling between the government and the collegium since March 22, 2016.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

facebook twitter whatsapp