Triple talaq is worst and undesirable form of marriage dissolution: Supreme Court

The observation came when former Union Minister and senior advocate Salman Khurshid told the bench thet women have the right to say 'no' to triple talaq.

Published: 12th May 2017 02:21 PM  |   Last Updated: 13th May 2017 05:15 AM   |  A+A-

Islam, talaq, halala

Image used for representational purpose.

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday said that Triple Talaq was the worst and undesirable form of dissolution of marriage while hearing the case pertaining to constitutional validity of Triple Talaq on second consecutive day.

A five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice JS Khehar went on to compare Triple Talaq to death penalty saying it is abhorrent but permissible in law.
The hearing also saw verses of the Quran being read before it by the petitioners to support their plea. “There is no mutual consent in Triple Talaq and if it comes to an end, whatever consequences will be decided then.” CJI observed.

Senior advocate Ram Jethmalani appearing on behalf of Forum for Awareness of National Security, said, “Triple Talaq is inherently unequal to women. The practice is abhorrent to God and no amount of advocacy by man can cure it. No discrimination against a woman is possible just because she is a woman. Can any law allow a man to get rid of a woman on a whim?” Jethmalani further said “Any customary usage is enforceable by court under article 13 which states laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights.” “There should be uniform code of marriage for husband and wife. Triple Talaq is discrimination on the ground of sex,” Jethmalani said.
On this, senior advocate Salman Khurshid, who is assisting the court said, “Islam says Triple Talaq is sinful but permissible.”

This led Justice Kurian Joseph to respond, “Can something found sinful by God be validated by laws of man?” Khurshid then explained, “The All India Muslim Personal Law Board is the best body to guide the court on the varying philosophies of schools of Islam about Triple Talaq.”
“We are not bound by any religious or parallel court, bound only by constitution. Nobody’s right and dignity can be taken away,” the bench observed.

Khurshid said the irrevocable nature of Triple Talaq can be negated if the three-time pronouncement of Talaq in one go is considered one leaving the scope for reconciliation and re-union during the ‘iddat’ (waiting) period. On bench’s query whether the practice of Triple Talaq is prevalent in other countries as well. Khurshid said, “It is not practiced in any other country except India.”

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp