Sheena Bora murder case: Bombay High Court reserves order on Peter's plea for case diary

Shrikant Shivde, Mukerjea's lawyer, argued that his client has the right to defend himself by pointing out any contradictory statements that might have been made by Rai after his arrest.

Published: 22nd November 2017 04:46 PM  |   Last Updated: 22nd November 2017 05:42 PM   |  A+A-

Peter Mukerjea and Indrani Mukerjea (PTI/File)


MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court today reserved its order on a plea filed by former media baron Peter Mukerjea, one of the accused in the Sheena Bora murder case, seeking the case diary from police.

Details of probe are recorded daily by police in case diary. The matter is under investigation by officials of the Khar police station.

He has also sought access to the personal diary maintained by sub-inspector Ganesh Dalvi, a prosecution witness who was also part of the team that arrested prime accused Indrani Mukerjea's driver, Shyamvar Rai, who later turned an approver.

Shrikant Shivde, Mukerjea's lawyer, argued that his client has the right to defend himself by pointing out any contradictory statements that might have been made by Rai after his arrest.

He also said the case diary which Mukerjea has sought to see relates to an earlier case registered under the Arms Act against Rai before the Sheena Bora murder case. It was after his arrest in that case that Rai spilled the beans about the murder of Sheena, the daughter of Indrani from an earlier relationship.

"Our viewing its contents will not harm the ongoing trial (in the Sheena Bora murder case)," he said.

The CBI, however, opposed the petition, saying that there is no legal provision which allows an accused access to case diary, unless the person already knows of a wrong statement made by a witness or informer, and wants to corroborate the same.

"In the present case, however, the accused (Peter Mukerjea) has no idea whether or not there is any contradiction in Rai's can he make such request based simply on a roving suspicion?" said Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh, who appeared for the CBI.

The case diary contains some crucial details of the probe and making them public could risk both the investigation and the well-being of witnesses and informers, Singh added.

Justice Anuja Prabhudessai, who heard Mukerjea's plea, also asked how could he demand access to the case diary on mere suspicion that there could be some contradictory material in it.

"The court can't give you the case diary to check whether a contradictory statement has been made and then confront the approver. The issue is not whether your viewing the diary will harm anyone....what this court has to see is whether you are entitled to make such a demand," the judge said, and reserved the order.

Earlier this year, the trial court had rejected Mukerjea's plea seeking access to the case diary. Mukerjea, the husband of Indrani, then moved the high court.

Rai was arrested in 2015 for illegal possession of firearms. During the interrogation, he told police about the Sheena Bora murder, which took place in April 2012. He also led police to the spot in Raigad district where her body had been dumped.

Subsequently, police arrested Indrani Mukerjea, her former husband Sanjeev Khanna and later Peter Mukerjea, her current husband.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp