Centre says completely illegal for Rohingyas to stay in India, calls them a security threat in affidavit to Supreme Court

Centre on Monday submitted its affidavit in the Supreme Court on the deportation of Rohingya immigrants to Myanmar and called them a security threat to India.

Published: 18th September 2017 03:23 PM  |   Last Updated: 19th September 2017 07:53 AM   |  A+A-


Centre on Monday submitted its affidavit in the Supreme Court on the deportation of Rohingya immigrants to Myanmar and called them a security threat to India. (File | AP)

Express News Service

NEW DELHI: The Centre Monday told the Supreme Court that Rohingya Muslims had links with the Islamic State and Pakistani spy agency ISI and allowing them to stay on in India would pose “serious security threats”.Arguing for their deportation in an affidavit filed before the apex court, the Centre said the fundamental right to settle in any part of the country and move freely throughout was available only to citizens. “No illegal immigrant can pray for a writ of this Court which directly or indirectly confers the fundamental rights in general,” the affidavit said.

“It is submitted that continuance of Rohingyas’ illegal immigration into India and their continued stay in India, apart from being absolutely illegal, is found to be having serious national security ramifications and has serious security threats.”The Centre said that since India was not a signatory to the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, 1951, the obligations concerned to non-refoulement were not applicable.

IN PICTURES: Worsening plight of Rohingyas in Kashmir

The Home Ministry’s 15-page affidavit was filed in response to a plea by Rohingya immigrants Mohammad Salimullah and Mohammad Shaqir, both of whom are registered refugees under the United Nations High Commission of Refugees. Their plea claimed they had taken refuge in India after escaping violence, bloodshed and discrimination in Myanmar. Since India was a signatory to various conventions prohibiting deportation of refugees to a country where they may face threat to their lives, the Rohingyas should be allowed to stay on, the petition said.

Though a team of senior lawyers, including Fali S Nariman, Kapil Sibal and Prashant Bhushan, argued for the petitioners before the bench headed by CJI Dipak Misra, the court said it “will only go by law and petitioners must now go through the affidavit filed by the government”.
According to the affidavit, Rohingya Muslims were a drain on India’s resources and posed a serious security threat to it.

“The Centre has inputs from intelligence agencies about links of some Rohingya Muslims with Pakistan’s ISI and global terror network IS to spread violence in India,” the affidavit said.The Centre said there was an organised network of touts in Myanmar, West Bengal and Tripura facilitating the Rohingya influx. “India has open/porous borders with Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Myanmar... making it vulnerable to a continuous threat of influx of illegal immigration and problems arising therefrom.” “The organised Rohingya Muslim influx started in 2012 and their number is around 40,000 now,” additional solicitor general Tushar Mehta told the bench. The affidavit said militant elements among the Rohingyas were active in Delhi, Hyderabad, Mewar and Jammu.

Extracts from the Centre’s affidavit in the SC

Vulnerable to infiltrations
…so far as India is concerned, national security considerations rank the highest on country’s list of priorities given its geopolitical influence in the region and its vulnerability to cross border infiltrations due to the porous nature of its borders which our country shares with many countries.

Policy decisions by the government
Whenever the country faces a problem of influx of illegal immigrants, the Central Government, in exercise of its executive functions, takes policy decision depending upon several facts, parameters, diplomatic and other considerations, potential dangers to the nation etc … When such decisions are taken to protect and preserve the fundamental rights of the citizens of the country and on consideration of various non-justiciable factors, this Hon’ble Court may not invoke its jurisdiction under Article 32 of the Constitution of India

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp