CJI is Master of Roster, Supreme Court rules for the third time

The judgment also listed the qualities a CJI should possess as the Master of Roster, including balance, fortitude, moral courage and independence of mind and as the court’s spokesperson.

Published: 06th July 2018 11:44 AM  |   Last Updated: 07th July 2018 04:31 AM   |  A+A-

The Supreme Court of India (Photo | ANI Twitter)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday ruled that the Chief Justice of India (CJI) was the Master of Roster and first among equals, having authority to assign cases to different benches.

“CJI has role of first among equals and is empowered to exercise leadership in administration of the court, which includes assignment of cases. There is no dispute that Chief Justice is the Master of Roster,” a Bench comprising Justices AK Sikri and Ashok Bhushan said.

The ruling asserted for the third time in eight months that the CJI is the Master of Roster, and observed that though the Constitution was silent on this, conventions and judgments over time established that the CJI was the first among equals.

The judgment also listed the qualities a CJI should possess as the Master of Roster, including balance, fortitude, moral courage and independence of mind and as the court’s spokesperson.
It is the CJI’s duty to usher in and administer reform as a continuous process.

“Erosion of credibility of judiciary is the greatest threat and what is required of judges is changing. Judges walk the tightrope of independence,” said Justice Sikri.
Justice Bhushan said the rich conventions and practices of the apex court were time-tested and should not be tinkered with.

The controversy over the issue had started early this year when the four most senior judges in the SC called a Press conference in which they criticised CJI Dipak Misra over the way sensitive cases were being assigned.

The verdict came on a plea by former union law minister Shanti Bhushan challenging allocation of cases by the CJI.

Meanwhile, the CJI has reconstituted the Constitution Bench to hear a batch of pleas challenging Section 377, dealing with unnatural sex, to include Justices RF Nariman and Indu Malhotra, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and himself. The bench will hear the case from July 10.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

facebook twitter whatsapp