Malegaon blast case: Lt Col Prasad Purohit again moves Bombay High Court, seeks to challenge denial of discharge

Lt Col Prasad Purohit, an accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, has approached the Bombay High Court, seeking permission to challenge earlier rulings rejecting his discharge plea.

Published: 19th June 2018 02:17 AM  |   Last Updated: 19th June 2018 02:17 AM   |  A+A-

Malegaon blast case accused Lt Col Prasad Purohit (File | PTI)

By PTI

MUMBAI: Lt Col Prasad Purohit, an accused in the 2008 Malegaon blast case, has approached the Bombay High Court, seeking permission to challenge earlier rulings rejecting his discharge plea.

On December 18 last year, the high court had refused to quash the government's sanction for Purohit's prosecution.

A sanction was needed to prosecute him as he was a serving Army officer.

The HC had also refused to discharge him.

On December 27, the special court for the National Investigation Agency (NIA) also dismissed his petition seeking discharge from the case.

The trial court, at the same time, dropped charges under the stringent Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) against Purohit, co-accused Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur and six others.

Purohit then approached the Supreme Court, arguing that the sanction to prosecute him under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) was not valid, so the trial court could not have taken cognisance of charges against him.

According to Purohit's lawyer Shrikant Shivde, the sanction, issued on January 17, 2009 by the additional chief secretary of the Maharashtra Home Department, was invalid.

Under the UAPA, the state Law and Judiciary department has to constitute an appropriate authority and seek its report first, before giving nod for sanction.

While the sanction was given in January 2009, this authority was appointed in October 2010, he said.

The apex court held in April this year that Purohit can raise the issue of the validity of sanction before the trial court at the time of trial or before the high court.

In the hearing before a bench of Justices Ranjit More and Anuja Prabhudessai today, the NIA opposed Purohit's plea.

NIA lawyer Sandesh Patil argued that Purohit should file a fresh plea before the trial court first, seeking discharge on the point of sanction.

The bench will continue hearing arguments on the admissibility of Purohit's plea in the high court on June 22.

Six persons were killed and over 100 were injured when an explosive device, strapped to a motorcycle, went off near a mosque in Malegaon, Maharashtra on September 29, 2008.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp