PNB scam: Accused Hemant Bhatt challenges PMLA court's jurisdiction, seeks case transfer to CBI court

The PMLA court has no power to continue with the case as the cognisance (of the charge sheet) has been taken by special CBI judge, Bhatt's lawyer Vijay Aggarwal said.

Published: 27th June 2018 05:14 PM  |   Last Updated: 27th June 2018 05:14 PM   |  A+A-

Punjab National Bank (File Photo | Reuters)

By PTI

MUMBAI: An accused in the multi-crore Punjab National Bank (PBM) scam today moved the PMLA court here challenging its jurisdiction and sought transfer of the case to CBI court.

Besides, another accused in the case today filed an application before the special CBI court claiming lack of coordination between the two prosecuting agencies - the Central Bureau Of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED).

Advocate Vijay Aggarwal moved the application on behalf of Hemant Bhatt, an authorised signatory of billionaire jeweller Nirav Modi's company, before PMLA court's special judge M S Azmi, who is currently presiding over the case lodged by the ED.

The PMLA court has no power to continue with the case as the cognisance (of the charge sheet) has been taken by special CBI judge, Aggarwal said.

The CBI had earlier booked Bhatt along with others under IPC section 420 (cheating) and relevant sections of Prevention of Corruption Act in connection with the fraud.

He is also named in another FIR filed by ED under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) in connection with the case.

"If the act or acts of an accused in the same transaction constitute more than one offence under different laws, the person may be charged with and tried at one trial for each of such offences," Bhatt's application said.

It further mentioned that the fulcrum of both the cases, being probed by the CBI and the ED, is the alleged unauthorised issuance of Letters of Understanding (LoUs).

Moreover, witnesses in both the cases are also common.

Hence, it is in the interest of justice that both the cases should be tried in the same trial by the special CBI judge, the application said.

The court is likely to pass an order in the matter on July 10.

While, another accused, Manish Bosamiya, today filed an application before the special CBI court claiming lack of coordination between the two prosecuting agencies - CBI and ED.

Aggarwal, Bosamiya's lawyer too, said in the application that, "The CBI has made him (Bosamiya) an accused and the ED has made him a witness, so how can the person be a witness as well as accused on same facts when both the cases are to be tried jointly?" The court then issued a notice to the CBI and sought its response on the application by July 23.

The issuance of the fraudulent LoUs is said to be the crux of the mega financial fraud.

An LoU is a guarantee which is given by an issuing bank to Indian banks having branches abroad to grant a short-term credit to the applicant.

In case of default, the bank issuing the LoU has to pay the liability to the credit giving bank along with accruing interest.

Nirav Modi and his uncle Mehul Choksi are among the main accused in the scam pegged at about Rs 13,400 crore.

They have been booked in nearly half-a-dozen cases related to the bank fraud.

They managed to flee the country in the first week of January days before the PNB was able to detect the fraud.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp