Ayodhya dispute: Supreme Court rejects all interim pleas seeking to intervene; to hear original litigants

The special bench said that only original parties to the dispute be allowed to advance arguments in the case.

Published: 14th March 2018 03:44 PM  |   Last Updated: 15th March 2018 05:04 AM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court (File | PTI)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI:  The Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected all interim pleas seeking to intervene as parties in the Babri Masjid-Ram temple land dispute case. As many as 32 individuals and groups have challenged a lower court’s judgment that divided the disputed 2.77 acre property between Muslim and Hindu groups.

A three-judge bench headed by chief justice Dipak Misra rejected the pleas by religious groups and individuals like Shyam Benegal, Teesta Setalvad, saying only the parties to the original lawsuits would be allowed to put forth arguments.

The bench said it would first decide whether the land dispute appeals be sent to a five-judge Constitution bench as sought by lead petitioner M Siddiq.

Besides Benegal and Setalvad, eminent persons like Aparna Sen and Anil Dharker wanted to use the disputed land for some ‘secular’ purposes. The intervention plea of BJP leader Subramanian Swamy, at whose instance the cases were fast-tracked by the apex court, was also rejected.

The bench, however, considered Swamy’s submission that he had not sought to intervene in the matter but filed a separate writ petition seeking enforcement of his fundamental right to worship at the birthplace of Lord Ram in Ayodhya.

The BJP leader had contended that he has a fundamental right to worship and this is a superior right than a property right.

The bench asked senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, appearing for M Siddiq, to argue and persuade it as to why these matters be sent to a larger bench.

Referring to the apex court judgement delivered in 1994 on a plea filed by M Ismail Faruqui, Dhavan said the verdict had made an unwarranted comment that mosques are not integral to prayer offered by followers of Islam.

“A mosque remains a mosque and the land where the structure was there belongs to the ‘Allah’ even after the demolition,” he said. The apex court has now slated the hearing for March 23.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp