Lawyers object to Kapil Sibal's appearance as advocate in impeachment case against CJI Dipak Misra

When the hearing began before a five-judge constitution bench, a lawyer objected to Sibal's appearance in the case, saying the senior advocate was also a signatory to the impeachment notice.

Published: 08th May 2018 03:20 PM  |   Last Updated: 08th May 2018 03:20 PM   |  A+A-

Senior Congress leader Kapil Sibal (File | PTI)

By PTI

NEW DELHI: Two lawyers today opposed in the Supreme Court the appearance of senior advocate Kapil Sibal in the plea filed by two Congress MPs challenging the rejection of impeachment notice against Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra by the Rajya Sabha Chairman.

When the hearing began before a five-judge constitution bench headed by Justice A K Sikri, a lawyer objected to Sibal's appearance in the case, saying the senior advocate was also a signatory to the impeachment notice.

"My basic objection is on Kapil Sibal appearing as a lawyer in the matter as he was a signatory to the impeachment notice," advocate R P Luthra told the bench also comprising Justices S A Bobde, N V Ramana, Arun Mishra and A K Goel.

He also referred to a Bar Council of India resolution and said Sibal cannot appear in the matter as he was a signatory to the impeachment notice.

"That we will see," Justice Sikri told the lawyer.

"He (Luthra) has raised an objection. We are not saying anything. We leave it to you (Sibal)," the bench told Sibal, who said if the bench felt that he should not appear in the matter, then he would not.

At the fag end of the hearing, advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay also raised an objection on Sibal's appearance, saying Members of Parliament who are signatories to the impeachment notice cannot appear as a lawyer in the matter.

Upadhyay also cited the Bar Council resolution barring MPs who had signed the impeachment notice from practising before that particular court and said in a similar matter seeking the ban on parliamentarians from practising in court, the apex court has issued a notice.

To this, Justice Sikri asked Upadhyay whether mere issuance of notice meant that the court has delivered its verdict.

Justice Mishra also questioned Upadhyay whether anyone could bar Members of Parliament from practising in the courts.

Upadhyay replied that the Bar Council of India can ban them.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments(1)

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Udaya Shankar Mishra

    I personally convinced with the wisest and legal objection against Kapil sSibal right to plead this case as being the signatories on the appeal of impeachment.The entire bench was in opinion to bar kapil Sibal from pleading the case.This is a hammer tone to Sibal if he presumedly tried to misguide the court.
    1 year ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp