Is Centre planning another disruption by proposing changes in UPSC rules: Chidambaram

Senior Congress leader P Chidambaram today termed as unconstitutional the proposed changes in the cadre allocation of civil services.

Published: 24th May 2018 02:32 AM  |   Last Updated: 24th May 2018 02:32 AM   |  A+A-

Senior Congress leader P Chidambaram. | Express Photo Services


NEW DELHI: Senior Congress leader P Chidambaram today termed as unconstitutional the proposed changes in the cadre allocation of civil services and wondered whether the Centre was planning another "disruption" by bringing about such changes in the UPSC rules.

He said the government's proposal to take into account the marks secured in the foundation course for allocation of service and cadre would lead to subjectivity and termed it as "undesirable".

"Is the central government planning another disruption? And if yes, why?," he asked in a blog post.

"Firstly, the proposed change appears to be unconstitutional, as it is violative of Article 320. The selection for 'appointment' to the service, now done solely by the UPSC, will be affected by the FC marks given by the executive government. I doubt if the proposed change can be implemented without amending Article 320," he said.

"Secondly, anonymity and objectivity will be greatly affected. 'Preference' of the executive government and 'subjectivity' will play a role in the allotment of service and cadre. Neither factor is desirable. There is a clear and present danger," he claimed.

The former home minister said the All India Services (IAS, IFS, IPS and IFoS) had their strengths and weaknesses and the examination, interview, selection, allotment of service and allotment of cadre were done on the recommendation of the UPSC which was "believed to be totally objective".

He said there was anonymity in the written exam and objectivity as the examination and the interview were conducted by the UPSC, with the Executive having absolutely no role to play.

This, he said, was consistent with Article 320 of the Constitution which mandates that "it shall be the duty of the Union and State Public Service Commissions to conduct examinations for appointments to the services of the Union and the services of the state respectively".

Chidambaram said there were no serious complaints about examinations or selection or allotment of service and cadre and a few and rare mistakes had been corrected by the courts.

He said the candidates' marks in the foundation course (FC) might affect their inter-se ranking allotted to a particular service or cadre.

He said under the change proposed by the PMO, FC marks would be taken into account for allocation of service and cadre and the 300 marks had potential to alter the allocation, currently based on the 2025 marks.

"Who conducts the FC? Who sets the question paper(s) for the examination at the end of the FC? Who marks the examination paper(s) of the candidates in the FC? It is officers appointed by the Executive government and answerable to the Executive government. The UPSC has absolutely no role to play," he said.

There has been a row over the proposed changes.

Congress chief Rahul Gandhi had urged students to "rise", alleging that their future was at risk as the prime minister wanted to appoint officers chosen by the RSS by "manipulating" the merit list in civil service examinations.

Gandhi took to Twitter over the proposal seeking to bring in major changes in the allocation of services to candidates who clear the all-India examination.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • mani tiwari

    I think govt should not interfare by such rubbish proposal. and shuld not be in hurry by overcoating an extra layers of assesments in the selection process. If such proposal will be implemented probationars will focus on the marks only. They will not be open there to ask questions due to fear of less marks. I m not agree with such proposal. I dont think any one eiter.
    10 months ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp