Liberty can’t be curtailed on the basis of conjectures: SC on activists arrest

The observation by a three-judge Bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra came while hearing the petitions challenging the arrests.

Published: 20th September 2018 01:54 AM  |   Last Updated: 20th September 2018 06:06 AM   |  A+A-

Activists Arrest

(T-B) Sudha Bharadwaj was arrested in Faridabad, Arun Ferreira in Mumbai, Writer Vara Vara Rao from Hyderabad, Journalist Gautam Navlakha from New-Delhi and 61-Year old Vernon Gonsalves from Mumbai. (File | Agencies)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI:  Emphasising that liberty of individuals cannot be curtailed on the basis of conjectures, the Supreme Court on Wednesday said our institutions should be robust enough to accommodate dissent while asking the Maharashtra government to show documents to justify the arrest of five activists in the Bhima Koregaon violence case.

The observation by a three-judge Bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra came while hearing the petitions challenging the arrests.

“We cannot stifle liberty on the altar of conjectures. We will look at all these attempts with the hawk’s eyes. Our institutions should be robust enough when there is an opposition to the system or even to this court. Then there has to be something different to constitute subversion of law and order as far as elected government is concerned,” Justice D Y Chandrachud said.

“Let us make a clear-cut distinction between opposition and attempts to create disturbance, overthrow government etc.,” he added.

Earlier, Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Maharashtra government, sought to justify the arrests made on the basis of the alleged incriminating materials collected during the probe. “Dissent is fine, but it is also important who is saying it.

If the leader of a banned outfit says it, this will have a different connotation,” he said.

Senior lawyer Harish Salve, representing Tushar Damgude, the complainant in the case, echoed this view and said, “There must be a distinction between a dissenting view and a criminal act.”The arguments will continue on Thursday. 

‘Institutions should be robust enough’

“We cannot stifle liberty on the altar of conjectures... Our institutions should be robust enough when there is an opposition to the system or even to this court,” Justice D Y Chandrachud said.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments(1)

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • SuchindranathAiyerS

    India curtails liberty on mere allegation. Remember Kanchi Shankaracharya? Thousands of tribals incarcerated without legal aid
    6 months ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp