Press duty-bound to stay truthful: SC court while delivering Rafale verdict

Justice KM Joseph  on Wednesday reminded the media of its duty saying that if freedom is enjoyed by the Press without a deep sense of responsibility, it can weaken democracy.

Published: 11th April 2019 02:11 AM  |   Last Updated: 11th April 2019 10:36 AM   |  A+A-

Rafale fighter jet

Rafale fighter aircraft (File | PTI)

Express News Service

NEW DELHI:  Justice KM Joseph, one of the judges on the Supreme Court bench which had decided to hear the Rafale review petitions afresh, on Wednesday reminded the media of its duty saying that if freedom is enjoyed by the Press without a deep sense of responsibility, it can weaken democracy.

Writing a separate but concurring judgment, Justice Joseph said, “The ability of truth to be recognised by a discerning public in the supposedly free market place of ideas forms much of the basis for the grant of the unquestionable freedom to the Press including the Media Houses.”

Interestingly, the judge cited his own father — Justice K K Mathew’s ruling of 1975 in the State of UP vs Raj Narain case wherein the judgment went against the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. The judgment at that time too was unanimous and there was a concurring opinion going further on transparency which was written by Justice KK Mathew.

Expressing concern over media bias, Justice Joseph said, “In some sections, there appears to be a disturbing trend of bias. Controlling business interests and political allegiances appear to erode the duty of dispassionate and impartial purveying of information.”

He reminded the Press of the public duty it has in disseminating truthful information as its freedom continues to be protected and said, “It must realise that its consumers are entitled to demand that the stream of information that flows from it, must remain unpolluted by considerations other than truth.”He added, “In fact, the right of the Press in India is no higher than the right of the citizens under Article 19(1) (a) and is traced to the same provision.”

He also laid stress on the significance of the Right to Information (RTO) and used the RTI jurisprudence to rebut claims of the privilege claimed by the Central government.

He further said, “I would observe that in regard to documents which are improperly obtained ... undoubtedly the ordinary rule of relevancy alone may not suffice as larger public interest may warrant refusing to legitimise what is forbidden...”

Sitharaman responds

Union Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Wednesday charged Congress president Rahul Gandhi with wilfully misinterpreting the  SC judgment on review petitions pertaining to its earlier order in the Rafale fighter jet deal. She claimed that Gandhi’s tweets amounted to contempt of court.  

“He has claimed that the apex court has agreed that a private firm has benefited. There are no such references to substantiate claims of Gandhi, who has surely not read the judgment,” Sitharaman said during a presser

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp