Centre wants Prashant Bhushan punished, says his CBI tweet amounts to contempt of court

Two contempt petitions have been filed against advocate Prashant Bhushan for his tweet which alleged the government misled the apex court in the appointment of M Nageswara Rao as interim CBI chief

Published: 06th February 2019 12:49 PM  |   Last Updated: 07th February 2019 12:43 PM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court Advocate Prashant Bhushan (L) and Attorney General to government of India K K Venugopa

Supreme Court Advocate Prashant Bhushan (L) and Attorney General to government of India K K Venugopal

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI:  The Supreme Court on Wednesday issued notice to advocate Prashant Bhushan on contempt petitions filed by Attorney General K K Venugopal and the Centre over tweets alleging that the top legal officer had misled the court on M Nageswara Rao’s appointment as interim chief of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).A bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra said it would address the larger issue of the extent of media discussion in cases that were sub judice and observed that the practice of making statements to the media by lawyers about cases had become common. 

“Freedom carries responsibility. What if bar is out to kill the judiciary? That’s what it looks like. Judiciary has to be protected from outside, not from insiders. Some lawyers seem to be carrying a dagger to kill the judiciary. When we haven’t fully decided the issue and lawyers make statements to the media, it can affect the public mind and efficacy of the court,” Mishra added while asking Bhushan to file its reply in three weeks. He slated hearing on March.

Venugopal told the court that he did not want any particular punishment for Bhushan, but there should be a restriction on the extent that a lawyer could go to while making a public statement on a pending case.
However, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Centre, sought deterrent punishment for the lawyer, saying Bhushan has a habit of attacking the judges and bringing down esteem of judiciary in the public eye.

The top court was hearing two contempt pleas against Bhushan. One was brought by Venugopal over Nageswara Rao’s appointment. The second plea was filed by the Centre, which claimed he had wilfully and deliberately made a false statement in a pending case. 

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp