Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case: Here's what is at stake

The dispute has, for more than half a century, not only dominated all election rhetoric, but it has also triggered the worst spate of religious violence since the 1947 Partition.

Published: 03rd January 2019 10:50 PM  |   Last Updated: 04th January 2019 08:25 AM   |  A+A-

ram_temple

The bricks brought over from all over India for constructing the Ram temple (Photo | PTI)

By Online Desk

The Supreme Court is scheduled to take up on Friday a batch of petitions for hearing in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute case.

It is likely to constitute a three-judge bench for hearing as many as 14 appeals filed against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgement, delivered in four civil suits, that the 2.77-acre land 'be partitioned equally among the three parties -- the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.

The dispute has, for more than half a century, not only dominated all election rhetoric, but it has also triggered the worst spate of religious violence since the 1947 Partition.

With the 2019 Lok Sabha elections just a few months away, the present political narrative of the country has been dominated by the temple issue for the last six months. RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat is leading the right-wing organisations, including the VHP, in mounting pressure on the BJP-led central government to frame law to facilitate construction of Ram temple in Ayodhya before 2019 polls.

The Congress leader Kapil Sibal has meanwhile even asked the top court to defer hearing of the title case till completion of the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, as it can benefit the ruling party.

HERE IS ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT THE DISPUTE:

The dispute revolves around a plot of land measuring 2.77 acres in the city of Ayodhya in Uttar Pradesh along the banks of the river Saryu, which houses the Babri mosque and Ram Janmabhoomi. Hindus revere the site as they believe it's the birthplace of Lord Ram while Muslims argue that the land is home to the Babri mosque.

The Ayodhya dispute, putting it simply, revolves around this question: was the mosque built on top of an existing Ram temple – after Mughal invaders 'demolished' it in the 16th century?

Muslims, on the other hand, say that the Babri Masjid was built by Mir Baqi in 1528–29 CE (935 AH) and that Hindus had started idol worship there only after some people desecrated it in 1949 AD, after secretly placing idols of Lord Ram inside the mosque, in the dark. Since the mosque was built on orders of the Mughal emperor Babur, it was named Babri Masjid.

The mosque was demolished by Hindu Karsevaks on December 6, 1992, in Ayodhya. The country witnessed massive riots in which over 2000 people were killed.

A view of Ayodhya | PTI

Following this, the Allahabad High Court in 2010 ruled saying that 'the world knew it was Lord Ram's birthplace', and that the disputed spot was first the deity's birthsite, and that the mosque which came after the temple, was not built in accordance with the tenets of Islam.

The next year, the apex court overruled the HC's judgement, saying it was a 'leap of faith'. Until today, the issue rages on with Hindus demanding the construction of a Ram temple on the site, with Muslims seeking reconstruction of the demolished mosque.

Prime Minister Modi has assured to not jump the gun on the issue and that the Centre would wait for completion of the judicial process before taking any action. His comments came amidst demands from various Hindutva organisations for an ordinance route in order for an early construction of Ram temple at the disputed site.

Until 2019 Lok Sabha elections, all eyes are on Ayodhya.

Supporters participate in Dharam Sabha being organised by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad to push for the construction of the Ram temple in Ayodhya, Nov. 25 2018. (Photo | PTI)

HERE IS A TIMELINE OF MAJOR EVENTS:

Nirmohi Akhara take over site

In 1853, Nirmohi Akhara members forcefully occupy the Babri Masjid saying it was Ram Janmabhoomi (Birth place of Lord Ram). Communal riots erupt and last for two years, in the first recorded incident of violence over the holy site.

Boundary wall built for Hindu-Muslims

1855: To avoid further disputes, a boundary wall is constructed to divide the mosque premises into two courtyards; the Muslims offered prayers in the inner courtyard. The Hindus offered their prayers on a raised platform, known as "Ram Chabutara", in the outer courtyard. The Chabutra is a raised platform 17 ft x 21 ft about a 100 paces away from the mosque proper.”

Permission sought to build Ram Temple

1885: Priest of the Ram Chabutara Mahant Raghubar Das files a title suit in a Faizabad court; seeks permission to build Ram Temple on the Chabutra on the outer courtyard of the Babri Masjid.
 
1934: Walls around the Masjid and one the domes are damaged in the communal riots. The British help in the reconstruction.

Another player enters the agitation
 
1946: A branch of the Hindu Mahasabha called Akhil Bharatiya Ramayana Mahasabha (ABRM) starts an agitation for the occupation of the site.

A man hoists black flag on a mosque to observe anniversary of Babri Masjid demolition as black day in Ayodhya  | (PTI)

Site declared 'disputed'
 
1949: The government declares the mosque a disputed area and locks its gates for fourty years after the idols of Ram and Sita are planted on the site in the dark. 
 
1950: On 16 January, Gopal Singh Visharad files a civil suit in the Faizabad Court, asking that Hindus be allowed to worship Rama and Sita at the place. Paramahansa Ramachandra Das files a suit for continuation of pooja and keeping idols in the structure. 
 
1959:
The Nirmohi Akhara files another lawsuit demanding possession of the mosque.

Sunni Waqf Board raises claim
 
1961: The Sunni Central Waqf Board also files a lawsuit, demanding possession of the site and removal of idols from the mosque premises.
 
1984: The Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) launches an enormous movement for the opening of the locks of the mosque.
 
1986: District judge orders locks be removed. Site opened for Hindu worshippers. A Babri Masjid Action Committee is created as Muslims protest the move to grant Hindu prayers at the site.

1989: In February, VHP declares that a stone will be established for construction of temple near the area. Communal tension in the region gets worse. The four suits pending were transferred to the High Court.
 
1991: The Uttar Pradesh Government acquires 2.77 acre land in the area and gives it on lease to Ram Janm Bhoomi Nyas Trust. The Allahabad High Court stops all permanent construction activity in the area.

Babri mosque is demolished
 
1992: On December 6, Babri Masjid is demolished by a frenzied mob of karsevaks, in which an estimated 2,000 people were killed.

Prime Minister P V Narasimha Rao's government dismisses BJP governments in UP, MP, Rajasthan and Himachal Pradesh.

On 16 December, the government establishes the Liberhan Commission of India to investigate the demolition of the Babri Mosque. Report finds many BJP leaders culpable including Atal Bihari Vajpayee, LK Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi, Kalyan Singh, Pramod Mahajan, Uma Bharti and Vijayaraje Scindia, as well as VHP leaders like Giriraj Kishore and Ashok Singhal.
 
1993: The Government takes over 67 acres of land around the area, seeks Supreme Court's opinion on whether there existed a Hindu place of worship before the structure was built.

Advani charged of conspiracy
 
1993:
In October, the CBI files a composite charge sheet and accuses LK Advani and other leaders of ‘conspiracy’.
 
1994:
Case goes back to Lucknow Bench of HC, suits heard again from 1996.
 
2001: On May 4, Special Judge S. K. Shukla drops conspiracy charge against 13 accused, including senior BJP leaders Advani and Kalyan Singh.

Godhra riots

2002: More than 50 people died in February when a train carrying Hindu Karsevaks returning to Gujarat from the Babri Masjid site is set alight, allegedly by a Muslim mob. At least 1,000 people - mainly Muslims - died in the violence that ensued,
 

L K Advani arriving at Vigyan Bhavan to depose before the Liberhan Commission in connection with Ayodhya Issue | PTI

Allahabad HC issues ruling
 
2010: On September 30, Allahabad HC divides Ayodhya site: one-third going to the Ram Lalla, for the construction of the Ram temple; one-third going to the Islamic Sunni Waqf Board and the remaining to Nirmohi Akhara.

The ruling states that the 'disputed land was Ram's birthplace', that the 'mosque was built after the demolition of a temple' and that 'it was not built in accordance with the tenets of Islam'.
 
2011: In February, CBI moves Supreme Court. Argues that 'the actual demolition of the Babri Masjid and the continuous assault on media persons form a single connected transaction and can well be a concerted conspiracy.'

Allahabad HC's ruling overruled
 
2011: On May 9, Supreme Court suspended the Allahabad High Court's verdict on Ayodhya dispute.
 
March 6, 2017: On March 6, the Supreme Court indicates it may revive conspiracy charge and order a joint trial of crimes 197 and 198.
 
2017: On March 21, Chief Justice of India J. S. Kehar advised the rival parties to initiate an out-of-court peace negotiations and offered mediation.
 
2017: On April 19, the Supreme Court revived conspiracy charges against L.K. Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi and 13 others in Babri Masjid demolition cases.
 
2017:
On May 30, BJP veterans L. K. Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi and other accused are granted bail by a special CBI court in Lucknow. However, the court rejected the discharge petition and said charges would be framed against them. 

July 20, 2018

The court concluded a series of arguments on the pleas challenging the 1994 verdict that mosque was not integral to Islam and to refer the Ayodhya dispute to a larger Constitution bench. The bench reserves verdict.

September 27, 2018

The Supreme Court declined to refer to a five-judge Constitution bench the issue of reconsideration of the observations in its 1994 judgement that a mosque was not integral to Islam which had arisen during the hearing of Ayodhya land dispute. 

October 29, 2018

The SC had fixed the matter in the first week of January before an "appropriate bench", refusing a plea for urgent hearing on the matter.
 

(With inputs from ANI)

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp