Delhi HC dissatisfied with AAP govt's efforts to inform public about facilities in its hospitals

A bench of Chief Justice Rajendra Menon and Justice V K Rao also directed the principal secretary to ensure that a ventilator was provided to a three-year-old boy, admitted in the LNJP Hospital.

Published: 30th January 2019 10:52 PM  |   Last Updated: 30th January 2019 10:52 PM   |  A+A-

Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court (File | PTI)


NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court expressed dissatisfaction on Wednesday over the manner in which the AAP government in Delhi had responded to the issue of putting online the details of facilities, like ventilators, available at its medical centres and hospitals and directed the principal secretary of its Health department to be present before it to answer its queries.

A bench of Chief Justice Rajendra Menon and Justice V K Rao also directed the principal secretary to ensure that a ventilator was provided to a three-year-old boy, admitted in the LNJP Hospital since January 24 and suffering from a medical condition related to the brain, who was in dire need of the facility and was making do with a manual resuscitator.

The critical medical condition of the boy and his need for a ventilator were brought to the court's attention by advocate Ashok Agarwal, who also told the bench that no steps were taken by the Delhi government and the Centre to inform the patients about the facilities available at the hospitals they ran in the national capital.

ALSO READ | 12 die of swine flu in Delhi hospitals; health ministry says no deaths in city

While the Centre told the court that necessary steps were taken to ensure that patients were made aware of the medical facilities available, Delhi government's additional standing counsel Satyakam told the bench that the Health department had only issued a note-sheet stating that it was discussing the matter.

He also told the court that the note-sheet only indicated two phone numbers for enquiring whether ventilators were available.

Taking note of the submissions, the bench said more than a year-and-a-half had gone by since the high court, in September 2017, had directed the Delhi government and the Centre to put online the details of the facilities available at their medical centres, but the steps taken were not placed on record.

It further said, "We are not satisfied with the manner in which the Delhi government has responded to the issue. We direct the principal secretary, Health department to appear before us on February 1 to answer our queries."

The court was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) initiated by it on its own after it came to know that a newborn had died as the family got no ventilator-fitted bed in four government hospitals in the national capital.

The court had observed that if information regarding availability of ventilators was readily accessible online, the life of the baby might have been saved.

A newborn girl died at the Jag Pravesh Chandra Hospital in northeast Delhi because it had no ventilator support, while the three other government hospitals where the desperate family had gone had refused admission, saying no critical care beds were available.

According to a report, the baby, after a normal birth on September 20, 2017, was diagnosed with birth asphyxia that caused less oxygen to go to the brain and necessitated immediate ventilator support.

"In the absence of a ventilator, the hospital asked the family to ventilate the baby with an ambu-bag.

The newborn died around 4 am on September 21," the report had said.

An ambu-bag is a manual, hand-held resuscitation device, which attendants are asked to keep pressing 16-18 times per minute to move air in and out of the lungs of a patient who cannot breathe on her own.

Medical experts had termed this practice as "primitive" and "condemnable", the report had said.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp