Ishrat Jahan case: CBI allowed to file reply on Gujarat ex-cops' plea to drop proceedings

Jahan, a 19-year-old woman from Mumbra near Mumbai, Javed Shaikh alias Pranesh Pillai, Amjadali Akbarali Rana and Zeeshan Johar were killed in an alleged fake encounter by police.

Published: 27th March 2019 09:28 AM  |   Last Updated: 27th March 2019 09:28 AM   |  A+A-

DG Vanzara

Former Gujarat IPS officer DG Vanzara (File | PTI)

By PTI

AHMEDABAD: A special CBI court Tuesday allowed the CBI to file its reply on applications moved by former police officers D G Vanzara and N K Amin to drop proceedings against them in the 2004 Ishrat Jahan alleged fake encounter case.

The applications were moved by the two retired police officials on Tuesday.

The court of special CBI judge J K Pandya allowed CBI lawyer R C Kodekar to seek the view of the "higher authority" in the investigating agency, as requested by Pandya, and submit its reply on April 3 on the applications.

Vanzara's lawyer V D Gajjar objected to the CBI lawyer's plea to obtain a reply, saying that the role of the central investigating agency ceases to exist after the competent authority in this case, the state government, denied it sanction for prosecution under section 197 of the CrPC.

He said Central Bureau of Investigation should have instead made a representation before the state government as there is no provision for a reply on the plea to drop proceedings as per the law.

Vanzara, a former deputy inspector general (DIG) of police, and Amin, who retired as superintendent of police (SP), moved their applications after the state government declined to grant CBI sanction to prosecute them in the case.

The two accused sought to drop cases against them on the ground that state government had declined sanction to prosecute them under section 197 of the CrPC, according to which prior sanction is required from a competent authority to prosecute a public servant.

The state government had declined sanction to prosecute saying they found no evidence against them after going through the record of the case produced by the CBI.

This was conveyed to the court by the CBI lawyer during the last hearing on March 19.

The court had earlier rejected discharge applications of the two former officers and had asked the CBI to clear its stand on whether it wants to get sanction to prosecute them from the state government.

Accordingly, the CBI wrote to the state government requesting for the same.

Jahan, a 19-year-old woman from Mumbra near Mumbai, Javed Shaikh alias Pranesh Pillai, Amjadali Akbarali Rana and Zeeshan Johar were killed in an alleged fake encounter by police on the outskirts of Ahmedabad on June 15, 2004.

The city crime branch officials had gunned down Jahan and three others claiming that the four had links with terrorists and had plotted to kill then Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi.

Meanwhile, Ishrat Jahan's mother Shamima Kauser also moved an application in the CBI court seeking copy of the government's order refusing sanction to prosecute accused Vanzara and Amin.

In her plea, Kauser sought the copy of the government order "in the interest of justice," and also requested the court to hear her on the issue of refusal of sanction to prosecute.

Vanzara and Amin are two of the seven accused named in the first charge sheet filed by the CBI in 2013, others being IPS officers PP Pandey, and GL Singhal.

While Pandey was later discharged by the CBI court here, six others face charges for kidnapping, murder and conspiracy.

In a supplementary charge sheet which still awaits the Centre's sanction, the CBI had named four Intelligence Bureau (IB) officials, including special director Rajinder Kumar and officer MS Sinha.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp