Bleeding hearts and award wapasis

One day it was bound to happen that one brand of do-goodism clashes with another, equally renowned brand.

Published: 15th November 2017 04:00 AM  |   Last Updated: 15th November 2017 03:23 AM   |  A+A-

One day it was bound to happen that one brand of do-goodism clashes with another, equally renowned brand. Irish musician Bob Geldof, best known for giving pop music a soppy, self-expiating philanthropic turn in the 1980s, has gone and done his own award wapasi, calling the Myanmarese icon of democracy Aung San Suu Kyi “a handmaiden of genocide”. He has duly returned the Freedom of the City of Dublin award because he doesn’t want to share it “with a killer ... an accomplice to murder”.

Suu Kyi’s extreme ambivalence on the Rohingya issue—countless people have been killed and over 6,00,000 displaced in recent state-led violence—has indeed put a big question mark on her claim to the elevated pedestal the great peacemakers of history occupy. As a partner in the still-evolving, quasi-democratic state structure in Myanmar, she has tended to prefer either silence or roundabout rationalisation. Not good enough for the great and the good of the West.

The Irish band U2—which participated in Geldof’s Live Aid that brought practically the whole western pop pantheon together for sentimental tributes like ‘Do They Know It’s Christmas’ for the famine-struck in Ethiopia, and also campaigned for debt relief for African nations—certainly thinks so. Her silence is “starting to look a lot like assent”, they said. Some want her to be stripped of the Nobel for Peace. And Oxford has retracted an honour it had bestowed on her.

A touch of hypocrisy in western pop stars—some of the wealthiest artists in the world—indulging in easy bleeding-heart politics without the burden of having to actually make things work in the real world has not been missed. A Dublin official wondered where Geldof’s knighthood stands given Britain’s “shameful record of imperialism”. And what, actually, has Africa got from Live Aid, one may ask. Nor should the grey antecedents of the Nobel, or Booker, or such awards escape us. Still, judging on a scale of direct complicity, it is doubtless that it is Daw Suu Kyi who faces harder questions.

Stay up to date on all the latest Editorials news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp