The Hadiya case was always about agency

The Supreme Court got it right. In a welcome order Thursday, the apex court set aside the Kerala High Court’s verdict annulling the marriage between Hadiya and Shafin Jahan on the grounds that Hadiya

Published: 09th March 2018 04:00 AM  |   Last Updated: 09th March 2018 03:14 AM   |  A+A-

The Supreme Court got it right. In a welcome order Thursday, the apex court set aside the Kerala High Court’s verdict annulling the marriage between Hadiya and Shafin Jahan on the grounds that Hadiya appeared before the Court and said she had married Jahan. The Kerala HC had annulled the marriage while hearing a habeas corpus petition filed by K M Ashokan, Hadiya’s father. That petition was the second he had filed claiming his daughter had been forcibly converted to Islam.

The HC’s verdict gave “custody” of Hadiya to her parents, despite Hadiya being an adult at the time, and declared her marriage void. Its judgment noted: “... a female in her twenties is at a vulnerable age. As per Indian tradition, the custody of an unmarried daughter is with the parents, until she is properly married …” This infantilisation of an adult women and nullifying of her agency sent shockwaves across India, as it set a dangerous precedent. Hadiya spent close to a year with her parents in what she termed “unlawful custody”.

When the case reached the SC, on a special leave petition filed by Jahan, the court made the controversial decision of ordering an NIA probe into the case, arguably validating the case for ‘love jihad’ being practiced across the country and raising the question of whether every consensual Hindu-Muslim marriage was at risk of being probed to the state’s satisfaction. Speaking before the court, Hadiya asserted her choices were made of her own free will, yet she was sent back to continue her studies.

The Court’s final decision on the matter, then, is cause for great relief, even as it said the NIA probe was to continue.The case was set up as a conflict between national security and personal liberty. It is telling the personal liberty so easily encroached upon was that of a woman. In Thursday’s order the SC finally affirmed Hadiya’s agency stating the HC was wrong to annul the marriage “because … she appeared before this Court ... and admitted her marriage with appellant No.1”. That is how simple the case was at its core.

Stay up to date on all the latest Editorials news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp