Ramachandrapura Mutt Pontiff row: HC asks govt to respond by Nov 21

Published: 15th November 2016 02:09 AM  |   Last Updated: 15th November 2016 02:49 AM   |  A+A-

By Express News Service

BENGALURU: THE High Court on Monday asked the state to come up with its response by November 21 on the representation submitted to the Chief Secretary seeking directions to remove Sri Raghaveshwara Bharathi as the pontiff of Sri Ramachandrapura Mutt. While issuing this oral direction, the division bench, headed by Chief Justice Subhro Kamal Mukherjee, expressed shock over Raghaveshwara Bharathi continuing as pontiff of Mutt despite facing criminal charges.

When a senior advocate, representing the petitioner, submitted that the rape charges against the Pontiff were dropped by the special court on the ground that it was a consensual sexual affair, Chief Justice Mukherjee observed ‘my conscience is shocked and kindly remove him (pontiff) if charges are proved.’
The Chief Justice also asked the government advocate to check with the Chief Secretary on how soon this matter can be disposed of.

In the representation to the Chief Secretary, the petitioners E Ishwara Bhat and others had requested to issue directions for the removal of Bharathi as pontiff, restrain him from entering Mutt premises, appointing of a high-level management committee headed by a former High Court judge and also conducting a special audit into the affairs of the Mutt.
On April 28, 2016, the division bench granted liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to the Chief Secretary, ventilating their grievances.
The Bench also directed the Chief Secretary to consider and dispose of the representation after giving an opportunity to hear all the concerned in the matter.

Appeal recommended against quashing of FIR

THE Lokayukta has decided to recommend the State Government to file an appeal against  quashing of FIR against C Mrutyunjayswamy, the then Chief Engineer of National Highways, in disproportionate assets case registered by the Lokayukta police. The High Court recently quashed the FIR registered against Mruthyunjayswamy due to procedural lapses before conducting raid on his premises by the Lokayukta police in 2011. The investigation by Lokayukta police revealed that the accused had possessed up to 99 percent disproportionate assets to his known sources of income.

Stay up to date on all the latest Karnataka news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp