Syro Malabar church land case: Kerala High Court stays probe against Cardinal George Alencherry

Besides Alencherry, the others against whom the complaint was lodged were priests Joshy Puthuva and Sebastian Vadakkumpadan and middleman Saju Varghese.

Published: 16th March 2018 04:29 PM  |   Last Updated: 17th March 2018 02:08 AM   |  A+A-

Cardinal George Alencherry of the Syro-Malabar Church (File | Melton Antony)

By Express News Service

KOCHI: In a huge relief to Cardinal Mar George Alencherry in the Church land deal row, a Division Bench of the Kerala High Court on Friday stayed the Single Judge order that had directed the police to register a criminal case against him and three others.The Bench also said any action taken on the Single Judge order would neither affect Alencherry, Major Archbishop of the Syro Malabar Church, nor the others. The case has been posted to April 3. With the order, the investigation based on the FIR registered by the police cannot continue until final court orders. 

The Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Antony Dominic and Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu issued the interim order on the appeal filed by Alencherry seeking to quash the Single Judge order. Fr Joshy Puthuva, Pro-Vicar, St John’s Church, Cusat-Kochi parish, Fr Sebastian Vadakkumapadam, Pro-Vicar General, Archbishop’s house, Ernakulam, and Saju Varghese, a Kochi-based real estate agent, had also filed appeals on which the court issued notices to the state government. 

when the case came up for hearing, the Bench expressed surprise over the filing of the writ petition on the same day as filing of the complaint before the police. “An order of mandamus is normally issued to ask an officer or an authority to perform a statutory duty in case it was not performed. But in this case, the writ petitioner, Shine Varghese of Cherthala, filed the writ petition on the same day of filing the police complaint, which is an abuse of judicial process,” the court observed orally.“Even before the ink could dry on the police complaint, the writ petitioner rushed to the court,” the court said.
Senior Supreme Court lawyer K V Vishwanathan, Alencherry’s counsel, submitted it was the SHO’s prerogative to decide whether a crime has been registered or not. 

“But without giving him time, the complainant approached the court alleging the police refused to register a case against Alencherry and others. Though the complaint was dated February 15, it was in fact presented before the SHO on February 16. The SHO has the authority to appropriately deal with the complaint and register an FIR if the allegations appear to be constituting a cognizable offence. But the officer should be granted reasonable time to act,” the counsel argued. 

The petitioner’s counsel argued city police commissioner had openly stated no case will be registered against the accused, which forced the petitioner to approach the court next day.To this, the Bench said Shine Varghese approached the court on the very same day of filing the complaint as was evident in the writ petition. Barring Shine’s counsel, none has contradicted this.“But even if we were prepared to accept the contention of the petitioner’s counsel the complaint was filed before the police on February 15, the petitioner cannot escape the blame he has, prima facie, abused the judicial process,” the court said.

Stay up to date on all the latest Kerala news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

facebook twitter whatsapp