Labelling Ex-Serviceman as Goonda: HC Orders Probe

This followed a petition from the retired Army personnel, M Marirajan, of Kothali village in Thoothukudi district, demanding action against the SI and VAO.

Published: 24th July 2015 12:44 AM  |   Last Updated: 24th July 2015 12:44 AM   |  A+A-

Madurai: In a curious case of a Sub-inspector and a Village Administrative Officer labelling an ex-serviceman as a goonda and putting up a forged notice on his mother's house, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court has directed the police to conduct an inquiry within four weeks.

This followed a petition from the retired Army personnel, M Marirajan, of Kothali village in Thoothukudi district, demanding action against the SI and VAO.

The petitioner submitted that A Sesuraj, VAO Puliyankudi, Tirunelveli district and V Surendrakumar, sub-inspector, Prohibition Enforcement Wing, Srivilliputhur, created a forged notice mentioning him as a proclaimed Goonda and pasted it on the front and backside of the door of his mother's house in Puliyankudi.

When Marirajan filed a petition under the Right to Information Act to the Public Information Officer, Sub-Tahsildar office, Sivagiri on May 2015 asking for information about the Goondas notice, he was told that no such order was passed.

According to him Sesuraj and Surendrakumar had done this as he had refused to pay them a bribe.

Elaborating the background of the case, petitioner's counsel Alagumani said Marirajan, who had started cable TV, travels and soft drink business after retirement from service, visited a relative at Sattur in 2014. On January 13,  2014, Virudhunagar Prohibition Enforcement Wing police registered a false case stating that he was involved in selling liquor. They foisted two more cases within the next three days against Marirajan, he submitted.

Then, to revoke the three cases, prohibition wing inspectors - Santhi, Sundarapandi and Guru Venkatraj - had demanded a bribe of Rs five lakh. “When the petitioner refused, the police detained him as bootlegger,” said Alagumani.

In the meantime, A Sesuraj and Surendrakumar put up the forged notice on the petitioner's mother’s house with the sole intention of damaging his reputation, the counsel submitted.

The petitioner approached the Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli district and Inspector, Puliyankudi. But, they didn’t take any action. Hence, the present petition.

After hearing the argument, Justice M M Sundresh directed the police to complete the investigation within four weeks and also to register an FIR if a cognizable offence was made out in the case.

Stay up to date on all the latest Tamil Nadu news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp