Sons Duty-bound to Maintain Mother:HC

Madras HC said as per dharma, sons are duty-bound to maintain the mother, directed one of the sons of a woman to provide her Rs 15,000 a month.

Published: 19th November 2015 08:54 PM  |   Last Updated: 19th November 2015 08:54 PM   |  A+A-

Madras High Court Quashes Cases Against PFI Workers

Madaras High Court. File Photo for Representation Purpose Only.


MADURAI: The Madras High court today said as per 'dharma', sons are duty-bound to maintain the mother and directed one of the sons of a woman, settled in Canada and earning Rs.three-lakh a month, to provide her Rs 15,000 a month.

Disposing of a criminal revision petition filed by the first son of the woman, Pon Devaki, Justice S Vimala of the Court's Madurai Bench, said the "right of the mother to expect her children to maintain (her) is not only statutory right, constitutional right, fundamental right, natural and moral right but also human right."

The petition challenged the order of the Madurai Family Court to pay Rs.3000 a month to his mother.

The judge said "as per "dharma", the sons are duty-bound to maintain the mother. When dharma says that sons should take care of their parents, it means duty, breach of duty is purnishable," the judge said.

The judge said the son should not have made his mother approach the Family Court. The first son, instead of speaking about the duties and responsibilities of a son, was talking about the duties and responsibilties of his mother.

"He has no authority to speak on that line," the judge said.

Regarding the quantum of the compensation for mother, the judge said the claim for maintenance cannot be a match for profit and loss account.

"It reflects the requirement of a mother who created sons for the world. The 70-year-old mother has ailments, she would not be able to render any physical work."

The sons were in possession of the houses and lands. Her daughter, who had promised to give her Rs.5000, had become a

widow and she would not be able to give her money. However, she can give at least Rs.3000 for her mother who had given her a house, the judge said.

The judge said the revision petitioner, Elangovan, must pay Rs.3000 as ordered by the trial court.

The judge said the second son Rajakumaran, who is in Canada, did not even take care to find out why a petition was filed by his mother.

He did not even contest the proceedings. By remaining abroad, he would not be in a position to take care of the physical comforts of his mother, who had claimed a total compensation of Rs.21,000 from the three children.

Her second son should pay Rs.15,000 a month. Even though there is no claim for enhanced maintenance by the mother, she expressed her requirements in a personal hearing, the judge said.

Stay up to date on all the latest Tamil Nadu news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp