Madras High Court recalls notice to Tamil Nadu Governor in Assembly secretary case

The Madras High Court has recalled the notice it had issued to the governor's office on a petition challenging the appointment of K Srinivasan as the Tamil Nadu Assembly Secretary.

Published: 08th March 2018 01:50 PM  |   Last Updated: 08th March 2018 01:50 PM   |  A+A-

The Madras High Court (File)

By PTI

CHENNAI: The Madras High Court has recalled the notice it had issued to the governor's office on a petition challenging the appointment of K Srinivasan as the Tamil Nadu Assembly Secretary.

Justice T Raja recalled the notice yesterday after the advocate general pointed out that under Article 361 of the Constitution, the governor was not answerable to the court.

Raja also ordered deletion of the secretary to the governor and assembly speaker from the list of respondents.

The judge passed the order after hearing the arguments of Advocate General Vijay Narayan that the governor enjoys protection under Article 361, issuing notice to the Governor was barred and he was not answerable to the court.

Justice Raja, however, directed the advocate general to address the question as to whom a mandamus (direction) can be issued, in case the petitions challenging the appointment are allowed and posted the matter for further hearing to March 21.

The matter relates to the petitions filed by L S Vasanthimalar and B Subramaniyam, Additional Secretary and Joint Secretary respectively of the Assembly, who sought to quash the orders appointing Srinivasan as 'Special Secretary' and subsequently Secretary of the Assembly.

P Wilson, who appeared on behalf of the petitioners, submitted that since the governor was the appointing authority for the post of secretary in the general administrative wing, notice has to be issued to the governor's secretary and the governor cannot claim complete immunity under Article 361.

He also contended that Srinivasan serving in the reporting wing had been wrongly given the post of secretary in the general administrative wing.

The post of secretary was going to be given to an ineligible person so notice can be issued to the secretary to Governor, Wilson submitted.

Opposing Wilson's argument and citing judgements of the Supreme Court, the Advocate General submitted that when the governor is exercising his powers under the Constitution or statute, he enjoys constitutional protection under Article 361 and there is a complete bar on issuing a notice to the governor and he was not answerable to the court.

The Judge said, "I agree with the submissions made by Advocate General" and ordered the deletion of Secretary to Governor and Speaker, cited as party respondents from the petitions.

Stay up to date on all the latest Tamil Nadu news with The New Indian Express App. Download now

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.