STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

PNB fraud case: LoUs worth Rs 4,900 crore were issued by the bank in just two months during 2017 to Nirav Modi, family

The LoUs to Gitanjali group companies were issued by PNB from March 1, 2017 to May 2, 2017 and the total value of the defrauded amount stood at Rs 3032.12 crore (USD 473.77 million).

Published: 17th February 2018 12:27 AM  |   Last Updated: 17th February 2018 08:20 AM   |  A+A-

Nirav Modi (File Photo | Indulge Express)

Express News Service

NEW DELHI: All the 143 irregular Letters of Understanding (LoU) were issued by the PNB to Mehul Choksi promoted jewellery companies-Gitanjali, Gili and Nakshatra-within a period 63 days beginning March 1, 2017, with the defrauded amount being Rs 4886.72 crore.

The LoUs to Gitanjali group companies were issued by PNB from March 1, 2017, to May 2, 2017, and the total value of the defrauded amount stood at Rs 3032.12 crore (USD 473.77 million).

Likewise, all the Letters of Credit were issued in 2017 worth Rs 1854.60 crore (USD 281.15) to Hong Kong Branch of Union Bank of India (USD 110214177) and, UCO Bank, Hong Kong (USD 247492719.4) besides USD 2200011.65 as Foreign Letter of Credit to Gitanjali Gems redeemable by Intesa Sanpaolo SpA, Italy at its branch in Hong Kong.

Both the LOUs and LCs were redeemable for a period of one year as against prescribed RBI norm of validity for only 90 days in case of import of semi-precious and precious stones including pearls.

“RBI prescribes that credit for import of semi-precious and precious stones including pearls should not be more than 90 days. However, in most cases the credit allowed under referred LoUs is much beyond 90 days. For outstanding Buyer’s Credit, the LoUs are established for 360 days ab-initio.

This should have evoked suspicion in the minds of overseas branches of Indian banks extending buyers credit. These banks (foreign branches of Indian banks) never raised any alarm on violation of RBI guidelines and continued to provide funding against fraudulent LoUs,” the PNB said in its complaint to the CBI on February 13 based on which the latest case by the CBI was registered.

The PNB complaint to the CBI further said, “There is no documentary evidence available to prove that these import transactions are bonafide trade transactions. There are several discrepancies in LoUs which could have been easily detected by ordinary due diligence.”

The first FIR also mentioned the period of offence during 2017. The Government’s claims that the scam started off in 2011 and acquired the mega proportions subsequently runs counter to the contents of the FIR.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

IPL_2020
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp