STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Securities Appellate Tribunal slaps fine on SEBI for alleged lapses in ruling

SEBI had imposed a penalty of Rs 50,000 on Pooja Mahna, a former compliance officer of BGIL Films, for alleged lapses in making disclosures under the insider trading norms.

Published: 01st July 2019 12:38 PM  |   Last Updated: 01st July 2019 12:38 PM   |  A+A-

SEBI

Image of SEBI used for representational purpsose (FIle Photo | Reuters)

By PTI

NEW DELHI: The Securities Appellate Tribunal has imposed a fine on regulator SEBI for an adjudicating officer's order that resulted in litigation and "harrassment" for a former official of BGIL Films & Technologies.

It is a rare instance wherein the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has penalised the regulator for alleged lapses. The order came on an appeal filed by Pooja Mahna, a former compliance officer of BGIL Films. An adjudicating officer of SEBI had imposed a penalty of Rs 50,000 on Mahna, for alleged lapses in making disclosures under the insider trading norms, in October 26, 2018.

Mahna (appellant) had tendered her resignation on February 19, 2010 and ceased to be in service from March 2, 2010. She was not involved in board meeting of the company held on February 23, 2010. "Inspite of this admitted position and inspite the adjudicating officer observing that a benefit of doubt should be given to the appellant, (adjudicating officer) still imposed a penalty of Rs 50,000 (rupees fifty thousand only)," the tribunal said.

In an order dated June 28, the tribunal said the appellant had to undergo this litigation and face harassment for almost one-and-a-half years and that a substantial portion was spent towards fee paid to an advocate for drafting the appeal. "The appellant is entitled to costs which we compute at Rs 50,000. The said cost of Rs 50,000 shall be paid by the respondent by a demand draft to the appellant," the order said.

While quashing the October 2018 order, the tribunal said the penalty was wholly unjustified and cannot be sustained especially when it has also come on record that the company's chairman had confirmed that the appellant was not involved in the board meeting held on February 23, 2010.

Stay up to date on all the latest Business news with The New Indian Express App. Download now

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp