HAL trashes DGCA findings on pilot, manual

BANGALORE: Hit by Director General of Civil Aviation (DGCA)’s findings into the 2010 August Chetak crash, Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) launched a strong defence terming some of the comments

Published: 17th January 2012 03:08 AM  |   Last Updated: 16th May 2012 06:16 PM   |  A+A-

17find01

A file photo of the August 2010 Chetak crash

BANGALORE: Hit by Director General of Civil Aviation (DGCA)’s findings into the 2010 August Chetak crash, Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) launched a strong defence terming some of the comments as “incorrect”.

In an email response to Express’ queries, a senior HAL official on condition of anonymity, backed the pilot Air Cmde (Retd) ROJ Assey, Flying Instructor at the Rotary Wing Academy (RWA), who survived the crash with minor injuries.

He had over 4,200 hours of flying and his trainee pilot Capt Virendra Singh of the Indian Army, who too escaped, around 15 hours.

Taking on DGCA’s comment that RWA doesn’t have an approved training manual, the official said: “We sent the manual to DGCA but the approval is pending despite several reminders.”

HAL says a special audit of RWA was carried out in 2011 by a special team and no non-compliance was found.

“Every year, the audit is carried out by an inspector for renewal of RWA’s approval where the current medical and standardisation checks are put under the scanner. The crash investigation report has not been written by a pilot, who understands the mechanics of flying and flying training. One has to take into consideration the total accident-incident free record of the instructor and comment,” the official said.

On DGCA’s observation on the instructor’s hover height and “improper” handling, during the time of crash, the official said: “While teaching we always maintain a higher height so that the pupil gets more room to manoeuvre. This is a globally-accepted technique. If the instructor was on the controls, this accident would never have happened. But if the instructor is always at the controls, the pupil will become a pilot without learning. Emergency actions taken by the pilot were the most appropriate in the situation. Blaming the pilot for not using proper proforma is ridiculous, as it is the one issued by DGCA.”

DGCA FINDINGS

■ While the instructor started following the pupil on the cyclic, the helicopter pitched up. This hover was due to not improper handling of controls by the instructor.

■ The instructor followed his instincts instead of emergency procedures laid down in the manual, delaying the corrective action.

■ RWA doesn’t have an approved training/procedure manual.

Stay up to date on all the latest Bengaluru news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp