Are people compensated after their houses are razed, asks HC

Court also asks the BMTF not to arrest or harass BBMP officials who have been booked for allegedly allowing illegal constructions

Published: 24th August 2016 05:18 AM  |   Last Updated: 24th August 2016 05:22 AM   |  A+A-

BENGALURU: The High Court on Tuesday asked the BBMP authorities if there is any compensation mechanism in place for the people who lost their houses overnight in the demolition drive launched by the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) in the city.

During the hearing of the petitions filed by officials against whom the BBMP has initiated action for allowing unauthorised constructions on rajakaluves, Justice Anand Byrareddy asked if there is a compensation mechanism in place.

Government mulls compensating those affected by demolition drive 


“Where do these people (who lost their houses) go for cover? Is there any compensation mechanism? Nobody is talking about these aspects,” Justice Byrareddy said.

He also asked the BMTF not to arrest or harass BBMP officials T Nataraj, Joint Director (North), Chowde Gowda, retired director of Town and Country Planning, and Mohammed Abdul Azeem, retired assistant executive engineer with PWD, in connection with the ongoing demolition drive.

Advocate M S Bhagwat argued that Azeem was not in the BDA at the relevant point of time and so could not have been arraigned as an accused.

Justice Byrareddy disposed of the petition filed by S N Builders and Developers and its managing partner Shah Sanjay, while restraining BBMP and BMTF from taking any coercive action against them or the multi-storeyed apartment building built by them as long as the sanction plan given to them in relation to those constructions at Bilekahalli stood valid.

Bhagwat, the counsel for the petitioners, contended that there is no cognisable offence against the petitioners. He also argued that the BMTF is in a fix as they have sent a communication seeking clarification as to which one — the century old village map or the master plan — should be taken into consideration while determining the cases at hand.

The government advocate informed the court that the demolition has been launched against encroachments on rajakaluves and no action is being taken against buildings that are within the buffer zone as the issue is still pending before the Supreme Court.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp