Increased pollution during Diwali causes breathing problems in Bengaluru

Despite aggressive anti-cracker campaigns and lesser traffic on the roads this Diwali, KSPCB finds a significant rise in pollution.

Published: 02nd November 2016 03:27 AM  |   Last Updated: 02nd November 2016 03:27 AM   |  A+A-



By Express News Service

BENGALURU: With anti-cracker campaigns stepping up and cracker sales seen to have lost their sparkle, officials had expected a less polluted Diwali this year. However, data shows that pollution levels actually increased, despite even traffic volumes reducing by almost half in the city.

Data collected from two Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring (CAAQM) locations of Karnataka State Pollution Control Board (KSPCB) in the city shows a surge in the amount of PM10 (particulate matter with particles less than 10 micrometre), which is associated with allergies and other complications.

Sample this. In 2015, the PM10 level at CAAQM City Railway Station was 117 micrograms/cubic metre. This year, however, it was 126 micrograms/cubic metre.

Though KSPCB is yet to compile the final data from all its 13 centres, preliminary analysis of data from the two CAAQM centres shows that pollution during this Diwali was more compared to last year. However, it was lower than the levels recorded in 2014.

Compared to normal days, there was an increase in the amount of pollutants measured by the agency. Though there was a decrease in the number of vehicles on the road during the holidays, it did not translate to any significant decrease in pollution. According to sources in Bengaluru Traffic Police, the city traffic volume dipped by 40-50 per cent in the past four- five days.

CAAQM at the City Railway Station revealed that the amount of PM10 pollutants recorded during Diwali holidays was almost the same as normal days. Both the readings were well above the permissible levels.

While PM10 readings were an average of 131.2 micrograms/cubic metre between October 1 and 28, it was 126 micrograms/cubic metre from October 29 to 30. The National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQ) for PM10 is 100 micrograms/cubic metre. At the same location, nitrogen dioxide (NO2) content increased by 33 per cent, from 40.3 micrograms/cubic metre on normal days to 53.8 micrograms/cubic meter on the two days of Diwali.

CAAQM at SG Halli recorded a significant spike in PM10 pollutant — an increase of 77.5 per cent during Diwali days.

However, PM10 content in the air was below the permitted limit. The CAAQM located in a residential area showed sulphur dioxide (SO2) and NO2 levels during the two Diwali days were much higher than normal days. While SO2 content increased by 20.2 per cent, NO2 increased by 38.5 per cent.

Ambient noise monitoring data also showed that noise levels increased in six of the 10 locations during the night. The increase was more pronounced near Nisarga Bhavan, SG Halli, where the noise levels increased by 35 per cent during Diwali nights, as compared to normal days. During the day, while five centres recorded an increase in noise levels, five registered a decrease.

Environmentalist Yellappa Reddy said the use of crackers requires a revisit as air pollution is one of the biggest killers today. “People take pride in bursting crackers worth thousands of rupees. Apart from the air and sound pollution, cracker debris consist of all kinds of pigments and toxins. The soot quantity in cracker debris is also higher,” he said.

He said that apart from initiating regulatory measures, ward committees should come up with frameworks to reduce pollution during the festival, he added.   


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp