Art has to keep clothes on in city

Artists say galleries are shy of exhibiting nudes and semi-nudes, from fear of public backlash.

Published: 29th March 2017 04:17 AM  |   Last Updated: 29th March 2017 04:17 AM   |  A+A-

Express News Service

BENGALURU: In 1918, a painting by George Bellows captured the tragedy of human shields. ‘The Barricade’ was inspired by an incident,  when Belgian people were made to stand in a line, naked, to keep German soldiers safe from bullets. This masterpiece may not find a display in Bengaluru today.

Many art spaces in the city refuse to exhibit  nude and semi-nudes by artists from fear of loss of business or of offending the public.

Shynu, an art consultant, says, “I have personally been to several galleries but haven’t seen any such work being displayed. Gallery owners or hotels know of this unsaid rule now and screen artists’ work before displaying them. They give do’s and don’t’s when you have to showcase work in their premises. We had some pencil drawings on a series of women figures that we wanted to display for public viewing in a hotel but they refused saying they have patrons of all age groups.”

A senior artist Paresh Hazra who works on human figures says, “Galleries want to sell the works. They know collectors and buyers do not like such subjects. People are not open, which is why most galleries do not keep such works.”

Calling such art “a realistic beauty”, he adds, “It’s not vulgar. Vulgarity is in the minds of the people. These are beautiful forms  of men and women, based on the ideas of an artist. Artists draw animals too. They are always without clothes.”

S G Vasudev, an artist, says, “Galleries do not want to take a chance with the public or the buyer. I think people have not understood (how to look at art). They usually think of sex when they see such work while an artist sees it as a form. If such forms are there as  sculptures in temples, then why can’t we have it in galleries?”

Paresh does paintings also of nudes but says few of his works were displayed at a gallery last year because the subjects were turned away from the viewer. “Mine are conceptual pieces,” he says, “and I had displayed the back of a woman’s body. It was part of my Adam and Eve series. So, it was not actually nude.” Though the audience is being more accepting of such work, says Belinda Fernandez, Manager, Sublime Gallery, some clients still take offence. “Some of them bring their children along. So, when they see nude work, they are like ‘Oh my God’,” she says. “In India, it is all under the table. We do not accept any artwork that could be associated with religious sentiments or if it can be seen as mocking (any group).”

Nude vs Naked

She adds that it depends on how an artist tackles any subject. “It depends on what aspects they have portrayed,” she says. “The artist should be able to explain the context of his/her work or if it has any meaning or social cause attached to it.”

We could recall the debate between the ‘naked’ and the ‘nude’, which was started by Lord Kenneth Clark in 1956. The naked, Clark wrote, is associated with shame and the nude is free of such readings.

Stay up to date on all the latest Bengaluru news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp