Special court rejects advance bail plea of 61 public prosecutors

The Special Lokayukta Court rejected anticipatory bail pleas filed by 61 assistant public prosecutors/assistant government pleaders (APPs/AGPs) working in various courts in the state.

Published: 05th April 2018 06:28 AM  |   Last Updated: 05th April 2018 06:28 AM   |  A+A-

Express News Service

BENGALURU: The Special Lokayukta Court rejected anticipatory bail pleas filed by 61 assistant public prosecutors/assistant government pleaders (APPs/AGPs) working in various courts in the state.Shobha Thamanna Bajantri from Chikkodi in Belagavi and 60 others moved for advance bail apprehending their arrest after the Lokayukta police filed the supplementary chargesheet that they had paid illegal gratification to officials of prosecution department to get themselves enlisted in the rank list of  APPs/AGPs in 2014.

While rejecting the anticipatory bail pleas, Special Court Judge Manjula Itty said the chargesheet was filed against them and the court had issued summons to all of them to appear before the court on April 16, 2018. They can appear before this court on the date posted for their appearance and seek regular bail. Accordingly, the petitions were rejected, the judge said.  

The petitioners moved the court seeking bail as they were under the apprehension of arrest as their names appeared in the supplementary chargesheet as “accused”, which made it difficult for them to perform their official duties without fear.There was no material on record to show that the petitioners were absconding or that they were proclaimed offenders. As these petitioners were working in various courts across the state, and their names were found in the chargesheet in the accused list, their apprehension was well-founded and reasonable as on the date these applications were filed before this court, the court said.

Recently, the Lokayukta police filed a chargesheet against Chandrashekar G Hiremath, former in-charge director, who was also the Member Secretary of APP/AGP Selection Committee, and Administrator Narayanaswamy and Head Quarters Assistant (in-charge), Department of Prosecutions and Government Litigation and 61 APPs/AGPs. This was based on the complaint filed by advocate H T Ravi from Honnagundi in Threerthahalli taluk of Shivamogga district, under the different provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act as well as IPC. The accused were charged with dishonesty, obtaining illegal means or valuable thing, criminal misconduct, causing disappearance of evidence, criminal breach of trust, forgery, cheating, and criminal conspiracy.

Stay up to date on all the latest Bengaluru news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp