HAL employees feel let down after fresh revelations on Rafale deal

However, retired Indian Air Force personnel — wary of HAL repeatedly missing deadlines — have defended the controversial deal.

Published: 23rd September 2018 06:18 AM  |   Last Updated: 23rd September 2018 07:51 AM   |  A+A-

Image of a Rafale jet used for representational purpose only. (File photo | PTI)

Express News Service

BENGALURU: Former French president Francois Hollande’s remarks that the Indian government had chosen the overseas partner for the manufacture of Rafale aircraft, has left employees of Bengaluru-based PSU Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL) unhappy.

Despite limitations, HAL employees, who did not want to be named, maintain that a willing government would have created the required facilities for the PSU to deliver the required number of Rafale fighter jets to the Indian Air Force (IAF).

However, retired Indian Air Force personnel — wary of HAL repeatedly missing deadlines — have defended the controversial deal.

“If HAL was selected as the offset partner, 30% investment of the around Rs 60,000 crore meant for the fighter jets would have had a drastic effect in improving the facilities here. HAL has produced fighter aircraft in the past and had the capabilities to produce Rafale too,” one of the senior HAL engineers that The New Indian Express spoke to, said.

“It is due to such episodes that the whole ‘Make in India’ scheme looks like a sham. A government can’t really encourage manufacturing by presenting a possible manufacturing project of a Navaratna PSU to a fledgling private firm,” the employee said.

The drama is unfolding on a daily basis, said another engineer.

“How can Indian companies like HAL compete with international firms if projects that help improve the skill sets of an organisation are denied to it?” she questioned.

Commenting on IAF backing the deal, she said that the Air Force had always preferred “foreign toys”.

“(HAL) employees are feeling cheated and angry as the much-required funds to develop HAL appears to have been offered elsewhere,” she said.

Noting that it is dangerous to speak against the central government, an employee in the HAL engine division said most of the employees had defended the government in the case prior to the remarks by Hollande.

“Disgruntlement over the government decision is similar in our production units at Nasik and Koraput, along with HAL’s research and development centres. The feeling is of being let down by the government, who did not trust our abilities,” he said.

However, some retired IAF personnel have defended the decision of the central government. “Hollande’s statement gives the impression that India can dictate terms to Dassault in choosing its offset partner. But, India cannot dictate terms to even Nepal and Bangladesh,” he said, adding that Dassault — manufacturer of Rafale — ‘were horrified’ about HAL’s capabilities to manufacture the aircraft.

Another reason why the old agreement of 126 aircraft was scrapped is that HAL was interested in technology transfer while Dassault was against the transfer of any core technologies. “That is why Dassault decided to partner with a private firm just for namesake and manufacture on its own here,” he added.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Dilip Basu.

    Rafale deal appears to be identifying an Elephant by a group of totally blind persons.
    3 years ago reply
  • Tk

    HAL is 45th in the world rankings out of 100
    3 years ago reply
  • Reghunath

    HAL quality control is well known for its lowest standards. Highest number of Mig 21 crash happens in India. HAL makes it. Mig 23 and 27 heading for an early phase out. Handled by HAL. HAL takes three times more time to do a work thus making it expensive and at the cost of operational readiness. They took decades to make LCA and the current production rate is just 8 planes per year. It's not the facilities that need upgradation or change
    3 years ago reply
    • sudhir

      its very easy to be judgemental....
      3 years ago reply
  • Mohan

    The reason might be the benefits which a private firm can give to certain politicians may not be possible by a PSU
    3 years ago reply
  • SJ

    All bullshit and ignorant talk by those who have no clue about the contract or offset. Firstly
    3 years ago reply
  • Indian

    HAL can not meet the quality standards and delivery schedule. Executives who work in the quality related area in the final stages of product acceptance always get quick promotions. Top ranks make happy these executive by bribing with promotions only to make them accept top ranks instructions on the quality concerns in the product acceptance. The top ranks always neglect other executives who toil from the raw material issues manufacturing issues in promotion related aspects. There is no proper grievance redressal systems for executives in HAL. If any executive raises voice against the top ranks no need to tell the harassments he faces. Hence all keep quiet. If a proper executive redressal systems by independent body is made many negatives and lies of HAL will come out. This will also help improve HAL performance.
    3 years ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp