Farmers Cry Foul Over GM Mustard Cultivation

Farmers’ unions and citizen’s groups claim cultivation of genetically modified hybrid variety of mustard will jeopardise food farming

Published: 04th November 2015 04:01 AM  |   Last Updated: 04th November 2015 04:01 AM   |  A+A-


CHENNAI: Five years ago, the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government had put an indefinite moratorium on the commercial cropping of Monsanto’s Bt Brinjal. However now, the Centre is considering commercial cultivation of a genetically modified hybrid variety of mustard.

Following news reports on the move of the application for approval of GM Mustard to the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee in the Ministry of Environment, Forests & Climate Change (GEAC), farmer unions and citizen groups from the city and different parts of the country are urging the government to not jeopardise food, farming and environment by introducing the genetically modified varieties in the country.

“The GM mustard hybrid has been created mainly to facilitate the production of seed manufacturers. Farmers already have a choice of non-GM mustard hybrids in the market, apart from the high yielding mustard varieties. But by bringing this in, we will be losing out on seed sovereignty and the cost that will be borne by farmers in future will be alarming,” said Ananthoo an organic activist and member of the Safe Food Alliance, citing suicides of Bt Cotton farmers.

These GM mustard seeds were developed by Delhi University and were called the Dhara Mustard Hybrid 11.  According to statements made by its developers, this transgenic mustard hybrid variety will provide a 30 per cent higher yield than other varieties and the costs for these seeds will be lower. However, activists claim that the non-transgenic seeds too provide higher productivity, and that the genetically modified seeds will pose severe health hazards like male sterility and other problems to both people and the environment.

“Once approved, it will provide a backdoor entry for various other GM crops in the regulatory pipeline. Many private players with seeds in their hands, from across the world would come in, causing chaos,” said Rajesh Krishnan, convener of coalition for a GM-Free India.

Despite filing repeated RTIs to the GEAC, activists claim committees are functioning in secret and this raises more questions and suspicion. “The GEAC is functioning in a highly secretive fashion, and bio-safety data is repeatedly being declined by regulators. In 2013, the Supreme Court Technical Expert Committee took a sample of the bio-safety analyses and pointed out several fallacies in the regulation. In 2008, it had ordered that bio-safety data be placed in public domain. While such orders exist, my RTI application for bio-safety data too has been declined with regard to this GM mustard,” said Kavitha Kuruganti, convener of Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) and an RTI activist who has been seeking bio-safety data for GM crops.

However, scientists from the MS Swaminathan Research Foundation urge the government to provide adequate insurance coverage to farmers if high risk technologies are put to use.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp