PIL in Madras High Court to ban illegal shariats

PIL has been filed in Madras High Court to ban the functioning of illegal Shariats, run by advocates and religious heads, granting divorce to Muslims and dealing with property matters.

Published: 21st September 2016 08:42 PM  |   Last Updated: 22nd September 2016 12:20 AM   |  A+A-

CHENNAI: A PIL has been filed in Madras High Court to ban the functioning of illegal Shariats, run by advocates and religious heads, granting divorce to Muslims and dealing with property matters.

Calling them kangaroo courts, the PIL from Abdur Rahman, an NRI in England, alleged that there are hundreds of such 'courts' functioning in the State, including one on Anna Salai. They granted divorce decrees whimsically and dealt with property disputes, too, he submitted.

The first bench of Chief Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice R Mahadevan, before which the PIL came up for hearing, issued notices to the State Home Secretary, DGP and City Police Commissioner.

"Because of the illegal functioning of the Shariats, the family system of a number of Muslim families have collapsed and hundreds of spouses suffer the ignominy of separation because of poverty," the PIL said.

By its name and by various publicity methods, the 'councils' have created an impression in the minds of local Muslims that they function in accordance with the Shariat and all its orders and judgments were religiously binding upon them. "Muslims facing family disputes are strongly and religiously encouraged to approach them by giving their complaints and on receiving them, the councils would send ‘summons’ and also call the opposite party over phone. Under the name of religious injunction, the parties are forced to appear before it," Rahman said.

Narrating has own experience, Rahman said though he too believed they were authentic fora and approached one with a plea to reunite with his wife, the council forced him to sign a letter stating that he was willing for talaq and that was pronounced.

Though the Supreme Court has declared such entities as illegal, the number of disputes entertained by the councils had exceeded a few hundreds every year, as was evident from the case number given to Rahman's petition, the PIL said.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp