STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Produce video clippings of confidence vote session: Madras HC to Assembly secretary

The first bench of the Madras High Court on Monday directed the Assembly secretary to produce the video-clippings of the entire session relating to the confidence motion conducted on February 18.

Published: 28th February 2017 04:15 AM  |   Last Updated: 28th February 2017 04:15 AM   |  A+A-

By Express News Service

CHENNAI: The first bench of the Madras High Court on Monday directed the Assembly secretary to produce the video-clippings of the entire session relating to the confidence motion conducted on February 18.

“Assembly secretary is directed to produce the video-graph recorded from the commencement of the confidence motion till the end,” said the interim order passed by the bench of Acting Chief Justice Huluvadi G Ramesh and Justice R Mahadevan.

The bench also issued notice to the Assembly Speaker, both in his capacity as head of the House and in his individual capacity, besides the other respondents, which included Chief Minister Edappadi K Palaniswami, returnable by March 10. The batch of PILs include the ones filed by DMK working president M K Stalin and Advocates Forum for Social Justice president K Balu, besides Traffic K R Ramaswamy, which sought to declare the February 18 trust vote illegal.

Stalin’s senior counsel R Shanmugasundaram submitted that though his client had given a request to the Assembly secretariat, he is yet to get the video-clippings.

Advocate K Ravi, who too has filed a PIL, said there were at least five key violations. A whip in the name of the government Chief Whip was issued to AIADMK MLAs asking them to vote for Palaniswami.

Balu’s senior counsel N L Rajah said the Speaker’s decision not to follow the Supreme Court verdict in the Jagadambika Pal vs Kalyan Singh case, where secret ballot was held, was irrational. Herding the MLAs and making them stay at a resort was a breach of privilege of the Assembly, he said. Citing the rule book, Rajah said each MLA should have been individually named before being evicted. The en masse eviction was violative of Rules 120 and 121 of the TN Assembly’s Business Rules, he added.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp