Plea against condition of Prez to remit death sentence binned

The petitioners were sentenced to death by an order, dated October, 5, 1998 of the Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli.

Published: 25th July 2019 06:20 AM  |   Last Updated: 25th July 2019 06:20 AM   |  A+A-

Express News Service

CHENNAI: The  Madras High Court has refused to interfere with the President’s order reducing the death sentence of three convicts to life imprisonment with the condition that they should not be given any remissions before their natural death. The power of the President under Article 72 is absolute and wide in amplitude. He is well within his powers to impose conditions while granting pardon, Justice N Anand Venkatesh said. 

The judge was dismissing three criminal original petitions from Radhakrishnan, C Selvam and Sheik Meeran who sought to declare the condition (set by the President) null and void and direct the TN government to consider their plea for premature release either under the 1994 Scheme of Premature Release of Life Convicts or under the GO dated February 1, 2018.

The petitioners were sentenced to death by an order, dated October, 5, 1998 of the Principal Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli. The order was confirmed by the High Court in April, 1999. The Supreme Court also upheld the sentence by dismissing the special leave petitions of the petitioners in June and also their review petitions in July in the same year.

The petitioners had submitted mercy petitions to the TN Governor, who rejected them. Thereafter, they approached the President, who in February 2012 commuted their death sentence to life imprisonment with the condition that they should not be granted any remission under any head. Now the petitioners have completed 24 years of imprisonment.

Rejecting their prayer, Justice Venkatesh observed that as rightly argued by Additional Solicitor General G Rajagopalan, the pardon and the condition imposed in this case came as a package. It has to be either taken as a whole or dropped as a whole. The accused cannot be permitted to take the beneficial portion and later question the condition that comes with the pardon. “The President would have taken into consideration the merits of the case..” the judge said.

Stay up to date on all the latest Chennai news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp