STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Ramalingam murder: Judicial custody of 10 accused extended by 90 days

A trial court has extended the judicial custody of the 10 accused in the case relating to the murder of Ramalingam of Thiruvidaimarudhur in Thanjavur district, by another 90 days.

Published: 10th May 2019 04:56 AM  |   Last Updated: 10th May 2019 04:56 AM   |  A+A-

death, murder,suicide

Image used for representational purpose only

By Express News Service

CHENNAI: A trial court has extended the judicial custody of the 10 accused in the case relating to the murder of Ramalingam of Thiruvidaimarudhur in Thanjavur district, by another 90 days.

CSS Pillai, a special public prosecutor for NIA, sought an extension of detention for 10 of the 16 accused men up to 180 days under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.  The nature of the injury was similar to that in “Jihadi” attacks which were reported in several States and it has to be probed further whether the accused have any other involvement with ISIS or any other terror organisations, the prosecutor argued.
While 10 accused are in judicial custody, six others are absconding, said the prosecutor.

In the petition submitted by the prosecution, it also said that Ramalingam removed the skullcap worn by one of the preachers and put ‘vibhuti’ (sacred ash) on his forehead. The situation was, however, peacefully resolved with the help of local villagers.  

Ramalingam was attacked on February 5, 2019. The accused used sickles and tried to chop off his hands, grievously injuring him in the process. His son’s efforts to protect him from the attackers were in vain. 
HRamalingam was pronounced dead at a government hospital.

The NIA also highlighted from a statement of the witness,  “That the conspiracy was hatched between the accused and they had to do away with deceased Ramalingam as he was against the Muslim people who are indulging in forcible conversion of Hindus to Islam.”

Denying the allegations, counsel for the accused, submitted that all the 10 have been falsely implicated by NIA. Counsel also argued that Popular Front of India was not a banned organisation in Tamil Nadu, contrary to claims made by the prosecution.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp