STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Kejriwal vs Centre: SC says LG’s interference has to be reason oriented

The hearing commenced before the five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra on the power tussle between the Centre and Delhi’s AAP government over the LG’s administrative powers.

Published: 08th November 2017 08:04 AM  |   Last Updated: 08th November 2017 08:04 AM   |  A+A-

Anil Baijal with Arvind Kejriwal. Express Photo | Shekhar Yadav

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: While continuing to hear the case pertaining to interpret Article 239AA that gave special powers to Delhi, the Supreme Court on Tuesday observed that “harmony should be there between the state government and Lieutenant Governor (LG) for smooth functioning of the state and difference of opinion should not be trivial”.

The hearing commenced before the five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra on the power tussle between the Centre and Delhi’s AAP government over the LG’s administrative powers. “There should be participative governance. There can’t be day-to-day interference by governor. Even if there is, has to be value oriented, reason oriented,” the bench observed.
 

Separation of power has a very important meaning. The clause which state that council of ministers will work on aid and advice of LG is an executive power. At present, LG demands for file and issue a notice to all officers to follow his instructions and not CM? Then what is the purpose of having CM?”

This led the Chief Justice to state, “Difference of opinion between LG and CM should not be in matters of triviality. LG should conduct his constitutional duties keeping in mind that he is an august head of the UT which is for harmonious governance and to maintain citizen’s trust.”

“Delhi government provisions giving extra ordinary power to LG. Delhi government can LG claim without following provisio say that Union Territory has an overriding power on state decisions,” Subramaniam said.

However, the bench clarified stating the provisions of the Constitution, the government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi Act and the Transaction of Business of the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Rules and said there was some kind of wall which distinguished Delhi from others.

“Unlike other states, if you (Delhi government) take a policy decision, then you have to intimate the Lieutenant Governor. You are bound to intimate the LG, but you cannot say that the LG has to concur,” the bench said.

“CM should get benefit of governance in accordance with rule of  law laid down by constitution,” Subramaniam said.


Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

IPL_2020
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp